:: Home :: FAQ :: Search :: Memberlist :: Usergroups :: Join! (free) :: Profile :: Log in to check your private messages :: Log in ::
Unimpressive Phelps?
Page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> WAS General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Diamondback

.
 
Caesar Americanus II Munchkin Wrangler

AHF Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 2967




Post subject: Reply with quote
Usual CL/DL practices between USN and IJN IIRC:

IJN:
DesDiv is larger formation:
->old CL or DL (Akizuki) as flag
->two DesRons, each with four ships of the same class (note: one squadron each combo was mixed Hatsuharu/Shiratsuyu, Asasho/Kagero and Kagero/Yugumo)
At least until attrition gutted the IJN destroyer force

USN Early War:
DesRon is larger formation:
->old CL (Omaha) or DL (Porter, Somers) as flag
->two DesDivs, each four ships of same class

USN Mid/Late War:
DesRon still larger formation:
->One heavy DesDiv, 5 ships of same class (DesDiv flag is Squadron Flag when both operate together)
->One light DesDiv, 4 ships of same class
Occasionally, a DesRon would rearrange itself into three sections of three for certain missions like night torpedo ambushes.

So, one Jintsu, Akizuki, Yahagi, or Phelps per eight destroyers is a historically-sound ratio. Fletchers, though, were always stood up as 9-DD/no-CL/DL units, and IIRC Sumner/Gearings were the same, possibly also the horde of Benson/Gleaves variants before them.
_________________
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Frickin' cookie crap...

IJNCVLF: 'Cuz my Avengers wanna bust more'n just BB's...
PostThu Nov 05, 2009 2:03 am
View user's profile Send private message
Rangefinder

 

Joined: 14 Jul 2008

Posts: 174




Post subject: Reply with quote
weedsrock2 wrote:
WarHighlander wrote:
Rangefinder wrote:
When I'm playing an allied fleet as opposed to U.S. only, I'd far rather go with Arunta or Haida as opposed to Haida. Both have sub hunter, far better guns than Fletcher, a range 2 torpedo and similar AA and ASW stats. I'll take that over the 3 armor. Interesting that only one U.S. destroyer out of seven (the little DE Samuel Roberts) has sub hunter.


Arunta and Haida are 1 point undercosted.


Actually, R.B. blogged just before Set II was released that he thought Arunta and Haida main gunnery stats are one die too much.


With all the negative SAs the Commonwealth is stuck with, I think they deserve a break or two.
PostThu Nov 05, 2009 6:03 am
View user's profile Send private message
Kirby DeWolfe

 

Joined: 04 Feb 2009

Posts: 16




Post subject: Reply with quote
I remember him saying that he thought the Tribal's gunnery score should have been higher. I haven't been able to find his original post though.
PostThu Nov 05, 2009 6:54 am
View user's profile Send private message
admiral_tee

 

Joined: 01 Jul 2008

Posts: 532




Post subject: Reply with quote
Rangefinder wrote:
weedsrock2 wrote:
WarHighlander wrote:
Rangefinder wrote:
When I'm playing an allied fleet as opposed to U.S. only, I'd far rather go with Arunta or Haida as opposed to Haida. Both have sub hunter, far better guns than Fletcher, a range 2 torpedo and similar AA and ASW stats. I'll take that over the 3 armor. Interesting that only one U.S. destroyer out of seven (the little DE Samuel Roberts) has sub hunter.


Arunta and Haida are 1 point undercosted.


Actually, R.B. blogged just before Set II was released that he thought Arunta and Haida main gunnery stats are one die too much.


With all the negative SAs the Commonwealth is stuck with, I think they deserve a break or two.


I 100% agree with that.

The UK has been burdened with too many needless SA's.
Gawd, you'd think with that many negative SA's the UK navy wouldve struggled to accomplish anything in WW2 and the Allies naval war was a 'one horse race'...

And using WaS as a reference point you'd think the Brits are shit at ship building, considering the their history as a global naval empire spanning a few hundred years and all...

Tee
PostThu Nov 05, 2009 7:19 am
View user's profile Send private message
RaySpruance

.
 Admiral

AHF Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 23 Dec 2007

Posts: 391




Post subject: Reply with quote
Diamondback wrote:
Usual CL/DL practices between USN and IJN IIRC:

IJN:
DesDiv is larger formation:
->old CL or DL (Akizuki) as flag
->two DesRons, each with four ships of the same class (note: one squadron each combo was mixed Hatsuharu/Shiratsuyu, Asasho/Kagero and Kagero/Yugumo)
At least until attrition gutted the IJN destroyer force

USN Early War:
DesRon is larger formation:
->old CL (Omaha) or DL (Porter, Somers) as flag
->two DesDivs, each four ships of same class

USN Mid/Late War:
DesRon still larger formation:
->One heavy DesDiv, 5 ships of same class (DesDiv flag is Squadron Flag when both operate together)
->One light DesDiv, 4 ships of same class
Occasionally, a DesRon would rearrange itself into three sections of three for certain missions like night torpedo ambushes.

So, one Jintsu, Akizuki, Yahagi, or Phelps per eight destroyers is a historically-sound ratio. Fletchers, though, were always stood up as 9-DD/no-CL/DL units, and IIRC Sumner/Gearings were the same, possibly also the horde of Benson/Gleaves variants before them.


Don't forget the Atlantas for the US.  They were originally designed to be the "flotilla leaders" for destroyers as well.  That's why they are equipped with 5" 38 cal guns and torpedoes, unlike other US lights.  It was after that that the navy discovered the AA potential of the Atlantas.
_________________
"Si vis pacem parabellum" - If you want peace, prepare for war

GOLD Rated Trader at +32

PostFri Nov 06, 2009 10:27 am
View user's profile Send private message
LuckyE77

 


Joined: 01 Jul 2009

Posts: 1450




Post subject: Reply with quote
I love phelps!  Mainly because my friend hates them so much he once used Yamato's MG agianst it.
_________________
"The situation is in doubt". CMDR Cunnigham, wake island, 12\23\41
PostFri Nov 06, 2009 1:13 pm
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Kleintje

 

Joined: 05 Aug 2008

Posts: 31




Post subject: Reply with quote
Establish Screen is a useful ability and there's nothing wrong with the ship itself.
Unfortunately initiative bonuses usually cost more than I think they are worth, particularly in such a fragile unit as a Destroyer.
PostSun Nov 08, 2009 2:51 pm
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> WAS General Discussion All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Donations are used for Forumini Olympics awards (donations admin: Aquarius)
Announcements
HERE'S YOUR CHANCE TO OWN USS NEW YORK!
Editor's Choice
Forumini Admirals
All War At Sea Cards
Dreadnought Rising
All AAM cards
Forumini Dogfights
Forumini Generals
Forumini Armies
Forumini Gallery
Friends
Official WoTC site
Richard Baker's Blog
Le Forum de A&ANM
Riverside Gaming
Locations of visitors to this page
Top posters
packertim 13359
RAEVSKI 6808
Okie 6666
The_lucky_Y 6599
Duck Crusader 5700
swarbs 5363
DaJudge 4758


Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Theme by: :: Cosmic Distortion ::
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group