| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Posts: 326
|
|
|
Post subject: 100 point Romania
|
 |
|
T-4 Medium Tank (x2)
R-35 (x3)
Romanian Infantry (x5)
Antitank Grenadier (x3)
Vigilant Lieutenant (x1)
Bohler 47mm Antitank Gun (x1)
----
115
What do you guys think?
_________________
 |
|
 Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:01 am |
|
|
Posts: 340
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
well you've overpriced yourself a little, this is 114pts not 115, but thats still not 100pts, but I assume your using the advanced rules single nationality armies rules?
you can get a little more in there though
2xT-4's
3xR-35's
Romanian Antitank platoon (Vigilant LT, 2xGrenadier, 2xBohler)
5xRiflemen
1xGrenadier
still 114pts, but now you have 1 extra AT gun
_________________
SHUT UP ABOUT AMERICAN POWER CREEP, YES WOTC DO GIVE THEM OBVIOUS PREFERENCE, THERE A US COMPANY, BUT IF YOU CAN'T BEAT US FLEETS OF ANY TYPE, THEN JUST COME TO THE REALIZATION THAT MAYBE YOU JUST SUCK.
Trader rating+10 |
|
| Fri Mar 06, 2009 3:44 pm |
|
|
Afrika Korps
Posts: 1390
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I do not know with the platoon cards, I heard they are obsolete because of the revisions.
Anyway, there are not that many romanian units but I would go for 115 pt with:
3x T4 = 69
1x Vigiant Lt = 8
5x AT Gren = 20
3x RO Inf = 9
1x R2 lt 35 = 9
T4 and AT grens for enemy armor, romanian inf and lt 35 for enemy infantry. Vig Lt for initiative. Maybe this build is heavy on AT units but I think the gren's can do something against enemy soldiers also.
I do not see any reason to play the Bohler and R35, but for historical or scenario reasons they can be an option.
_________________
Custom AAM Maps & Counters here
 |
|
| Fri Mar 06, 2009 7:14 pm |
|
|
Posts: 340
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| RedBaron wrote: | | I do not know with the platoon cards, I heard they are obsolete because of the revisions. |
well after looking at the A&A home site I see nothing saying there useless
_________________
SHUT UP ABOUT AMERICAN POWER CREEP, YES WOTC DO GIVE THEM OBVIOUS PREFERENCE, THERE A US COMPANY, BUT IF YOU CAN'T BEAT US FLEETS OF ANY TYPE, THEN JUST COME TO THE REALIZATION THAT MAYBE YOU JUST SUCK.
Trader rating+10 |
|
| Fri Mar 06, 2009 7:44 pm |
|
|
Afrika Korps
Posts: 1390
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
If I am not mistaking (I could be though), the point system for platoons was calculated before the revision when a RO AT Gren had a value of 5 points not 4, for example. That changes everything...
_________________
Custom AAM Maps & Counters here
|
|
| Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:32 pm |
|
|
Posts: 9280
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
That's right.
_________________
 
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:37 pm |
|
|
"Earn This."
|
|
Post subject: Re: 100 point Romania
|
|
|
| Ducky wrote: | T-4 Medium Tank (x2)
R-35 (x3)
Romanian Infantry (x5)
Antitank Grenadier (x3)
Vigilant Lieutenant (x1)
Bohler 47mm Antitank Gun (x1)
----
115
What do you guys think? |
I would go with more Bohlers and less Renaults because they are such a great value and can get a bonus from the commander. Just my 2 cents, I love those camouflaged ATGs.
_________________
 |
|
| Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:33 pm |
|
|
Posts: 340
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| RedBaron wrote: | | If I am not mistaking (I could be though), the point system for platoons was calculated before the revision when a RO AT Gren had a value of 5 points not 4, for example. That changes everything... |
no it doesn't, a platoon of them is still 22pts, in the old costs you saved 10pts, in the new costs your now only saving 8pts, so now technically is less of a good deal by 2pts, its not giving you any advantages still
_________________
SHUT UP ABOUT AMERICAN POWER CREEP, YES WOTC DO GIVE THEM OBVIOUS PREFERENCE, THERE A US COMPANY, BUT IF YOU CAN'T BEAT US FLEETS OF ANY TYPE, THEN JUST COME TO THE REALIZATION THAT MAYBE YOU JUST SUCK.
Trader rating+10 |
|
| Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:34 pm |
|
|
"Earn This."
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| King Tiger wrote: | | RedBaron wrote: | | If I am not mistaking (I could be though), the point system for platoons was calculated before the revision when a RO AT Gren had a value of 5 points not 4, for example. That changes everything... |
no it doesn't, a platoon of them is still 22pts, in the old costs you saved 10pts, in the new costs your now only saving 8pts, so now technically is less of a good deal by 2pts, its not giving you any advantages still |
Sticking to your guns huh?
Platoons are laserdiscs or betamax. Functionally Obsolete.
_________________
|
|
| Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:38 pm |
|
|
Posts: 326
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Cpt. John Miller wrote: | | King Tiger wrote: | | RedBaron wrote: | | If I am not mistaking (I could be though), the point system for platoons was calculated before the revision when a RO AT Gren had a value of 5 points not 4, for example. That changes everything... |
no it doesn't, a platoon of them is still 22pts, in the old costs you saved 10pts, in the new costs your now only saving 8pts, so now technically is less of a good deal by 2pts, its not giving you any advantages still |
Sticking to your guns huh?
Platoons are laserdiscs or betamax. Functionally Obsolete. |
It's true, but along with losing some benefits of the platoons, Nationalist China can have Brit/American allies, and 1940+ Poland can rejoin the fight 
_________________
|
|
| Sun Jun 14, 2009 11:50 pm |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
Donations are used for Forumini Olympics awards (donations admin: Aquarius)
| Forumini Gallery |
 |
|
