| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Posts: 9
|
|
|
Post subject: new t34 custom line
|
 |
|
Hi i decided that t34 line is first overcosted and I made this changes. Whot do you think
this changes makes other
bicouse i lake to be consequent this changes makes some other:
and
 |
|
 Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:53 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
If you're going to change them, why not reduce the back armour?
_________________
 |
|
| Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:24 pm |
|
|
Posts: 9
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| back armour was wery close in thiknes to frontal ok 45mm. |
|
| Fri Sep 18, 2009 4:37 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Thinking about it more, I wonder if you didn't shortchange the tanks by not figuring in the slope.
The back might be nearly the same thickness but the lack of slope and presence of vents, pipes, grills etc might make it lower.
Early SU's needed to be lowered, but I'm not sure about T-34's. Should definitely be higher than a Sherman. Of course, you might be changing that as well.
_________________
|
|
| Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:23 am |
|
|
Posts: 9
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| sherman has thicker armour front hull (about 8/9 mm) and on front turret 25mm. (and t34 get superior)It wosnt big diference beatven attacking t34 from front and from rear (it was diference for planes) |
|
| Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:25 am |
|
|
|
