| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Posts: 749
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
 |
|
Me -- But what type of rules are we playing with here? Is it one of those lame escalated deathmatch setups?
_________________
 |
|
 Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:28 pm |
|
|
Moderator (here to help you!)
Supreme AHF Trader
Posts: 2125
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
no its the lamer advanced rulez...
_________________
[img.]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Animated_gun_turret.gif[/img]
Lieber eine flotte Rote als die rote Flotte! |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:32 pm |
|
|
USS OKLAHOMA BB-37
Posts: 6666
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I also would like to know the rule's and Point limit ect.. Thank's!! Okie
_________________
 |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:34 pm |
|
|
Posts: 933
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| I propose that the French fleet's opponent cannot use aircraft because the French do not have aircraft. Does that make sense? |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:13 pm |
|
|
Posts: 749
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
That or we could play where 1/3 of the french fleet can include "allied" (as in axis for vichy or allied units for free french) units.
_________________
|
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:22 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
this is why some Nations are at a serious Disadvantage
In the first Admirals Cup, I had Germany and there was only 1 set out at the time. Having No fighter sucked, but at least I had the choice of air. Not having the choice is really going to be worse now. What does Canada have? And someone will have to build a entire Canadian fleet, Same with the Aussies.
The dutch? I won't even go here. If they can have exceptions, why can't others?
I am all for these kinds of tourny's but some balance issues need to be addressed.
_________________
 |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:22 pm |
|
|
Posts: 933
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| French can have a choice of air- UK or Germany/Italy but not both. |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:29 pm |
|
|
Posts: 933
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
As for all this complaining, I think that paralysis by analysis could occur...
I'm just throwing ideas out there concerning options with Admirals and air fleets.
Players just want a fair game, nobody wants to be stiffed "just because thats the way it is"
Am I going to lose? Probably
But I will try my best and have fun. The fun factor will depend largely on if my opponent has a super-Admiral and I get the guy with a bonus to Kinai Marus.
And I think my opponent in such match-up will be bored too.
Sure, something is going to bother somebody. Too many objectives. Not enough objectives. Whatever the issue is, you can't argue that balance and fairness are at least something to strive for.
Some imbalance is good I think, but not Kinai Maru v. Iowa. |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:43 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Reading through the Admirals Cards, And this concerns me:
Seriously, When will this get used, The ability that is. This is a convoy scenario Adm.
_________________
|
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:46 pm |
|
|
Posts: 933
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Bring 66 Liberty ships for a 200 point build. Set them up in the first four rows and hope to get a lot off the map. It will be like Space Invaders... |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:53 pm |
|
|
Posts: 933
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Gross Admiral Raeder wrote: | Reading through the Admirals Cards, And this concerns me:
Seriously, When will this get used, The ability that is. This is a convoy scenario Adm. |
It basically means you don't get an Admiral in the tournament. |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:54 pm |
|
|
Posts: 9281
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
What's with all the negative waves  .
Please accept the fact that some admirals are better than others and some nations better than others, just as some players are luckier than others. We are not going to change the rules.
_________________
 
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:54 pm |
|
|
Posts: 9281
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Okie wrote: | | I also would like to know the rule's and Point limit ect.. Thank's!! Okie |
It's the normal WAS latest rules. I'm sure you are in, right? I count you in 
Point limit usually increased by the game. It's Raevski's choice. It will be something low first game.
Another 14 places to go.
_________________
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:57 pm |
|
|
Posts: 933
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| NeuralDream wrote: | What's with all the negative waves .
Please accept the fact that some admirals are better than others and some nations better than others, just as some players are luckier than others. We are not going to change the rules. |
I respect that and do not envy the hot seat of criticism. But you have to admit that not giving someone an Admiral seems like a mistake. Which is what Kincaid is in this tourny.
Of course the the imbalance is acceptable, in fact it is necessary. |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:00 pm |
|
|
SOCCEROO FEVER
Posts: 6808
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Gross Admiral Raeder wrote: | this is why some Nations are at a serious Disadvantage
In the first Admirals Cup, I had Germany and there was only 1 set out at the time. Having No fighter sucked, but at least I had the choice of air. Not having the choice is really going to be worse now. What does Canada have? And someone will have to build a entire Canadian fleet, Same with the Aussies.
The dutch? I won't even go here. If they can have exceptions, why can't others?
I am all for these kinds of tourny's but some balance issues need to be addressed. |
please read the Dutch and Aussie cards. the aussie can have any air, but no BBs.
_________________
 |
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:01 pm |
|
|
SOCCEROO FEVER
Posts: 6808
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
nd can we do a global annouvncement here
_________________
|
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:13 pm |
|
|
SOCCEROO FEVER
Posts: 6808
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| NeuralDream wrote: | | Okie wrote: | | I also would like to know the rule's and Point limit ect.. Thank's!! Okie |
It's the normal WAS latest rules. I'm sure you are in, right? I count you in
Point limit usually increased by the game. It's Raevski's choice. It will be something low first game.
Another 14 places to go. |
The points in a first match will be 75. The smaller fleets i.e Dutch or Aussie would be given a better chance of survival if the points are low. Also matches will get finished faster especially when 2 time zones are invovled. Also in first round i am tossing around in having a maxium point limit on 1 ship.
_________________
|
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:28 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I am not complaining, Just stating the fact that the fore mentioned Admiral Does Nothing for you.
I did read the cards for the Aussies and Dutch. Why do they have to pay extra for non Australian units? Are they not handicapped enough by not being able to Deploy BB's?
_________________
|
|
| Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:41 pm |
|
|
SOCCEROO FEVER
Posts: 6808
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Gross Admiral Raeder wrote: | I am not complaining, Just stating the fact that the fore mentioned Admiral Does Nothing for you.
I did read the cards for the Aussies and Dutch. Why do they have to pay extra for non Australian units? Are they not handicapped enough by not being able to Deploy BB's? |
It is too encourage u to use Dutch/ Aussie units in those fleets.
_________________
|
|
| Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:00 am |
|
|
Posts: 1368
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| RAEVSKI wrote: | | NeuralDream wrote: | | Okie wrote: | | I also would like to know the rule's and Point limit ect.. Thank's!! Okie |
It's the normal WAS latest rules. I'm sure you are in, right? I count you in
Point limit usually increased by the game. It's Raevski's choice. It will be something low first game.
Another 14 places to go. |
The points in a first match will be 75. The smaller fleets i.e Dutch or Aussie would be given a better chance of survival if the points are low. Also matches will get finished faster especially when 2 time zones are invovled. Also in first round i am tossing around in having a maxium point limit on 1 ship. |
I'd use the maximum ship point limit, but it could give countries with cheap BBs an advantage. Like if it's 35, then Repulse would kill everything on the surface. Will the points per match go up each round? |
|
| Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:24 am |
|
|
|
