| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which is your favourite 1939 tank and why? |
| 7TPdw |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| BT-7 |
|
4% |
[ 2 ] |
| Char B1-BIS |
|
36% |
[ 15 ] |
| Elite Panzer IV Ausf. D |
|
26% |
[ 11 ] |
| L3/35 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Panzer II Ausf. C |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Renault R-35 |
|
4% |
[ 2 ] |
| T-26B |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| T-35 |
|
12% |
[ 5 ] |
| Type 95 Ha-Go |
|
7% |
[ 3 ] |
| Other, please explain which one |
|
7% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 41 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Posts: 9280
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: Which is your favourite 1939 tank?
|
 |
|
| Nalleman wrote: | | Poll will last for 14 days. What should be the next poll? Do you want the poll last longer or shorter time? |
Why should it end?
_________________
 
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
 Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:51 pm |
|
|
AHF Gold-Rated Trader
Posts: 126
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: Which is your favourite 1939 tank?
|
|
|
| NeuralDream wrote: | | Nalleman wrote: | | Poll will last for 14 days. What should be the next poll? Do you want the poll last longer or shorter time? |
Why should it end? |
Good point, but I would also like to summarize different polls together. Maybe we should have a poll about what to do with polls 
_________________
My tradelist at http://aaminis.myfastforum.org/about745.html |
|
| Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:30 pm |
|
|
Posts: 397
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| I went with T-35 because it looks so cool. Almost enough turrets to name them for the days of the week but that honor goes to HMS Agincourt. |
|
| Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:00 pm |
|
|
Bronze-Rated Trader
Posts: 701
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| I picked the Char B1-bis because it looks to be the toughest. |
|
| Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:31 am |
|
|
Posts: 885
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I'm going to dig up this old thread, because early war is coming soon and the AAM boards need to get going again.
I vote for the Panzer 38 (t). Great tank for the price, decent speed, good armour, good AT and AI. Great overall.
Do you think the Panzer 38 (t) will be re-issued in EW? |
|
| Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:42 am |
|
|
START THE PURPLE!
Posts: 623
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
The 38t should be with an EW set, but i doubt that would make sense to the 'Chimps in Charge'. Ergo you could say they're shouldn't have been that stupid Jap gun and the soviet pieces with NA. BASTARDS!!BASTARDS!!! 
_________________
 |
|
| Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:57 am |
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Panzer II C. Certainly not the best tank, but nevertheless my favourite. Hard to say why. Guess because they've undersold it so much giving it the stats it has. AS should have been 7/7/6 and AV 5/4/3. That and double shot and excellent suspension actually would have made for quite a decent early war tank.....
PS: Isn't it possible to vote anymore????? |
|
| Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:58 pm |
|
|
Posts: 885
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sgt WAKA wrote: | | The 38t should be with an EW set, but i doubt that would make sense to the 'Chimps in Charge'. Ergo you could say they're shouldn't have been that stupid Jap gun and the soviet pieces with NA. BASTARDS!!BASTARDS!!! |
Well we do have the 38 (t) from EF already, it's a nice scuplt. I'd be happy to proxy it if needed. Of course the 38 (t) fits well in both EF and EW.
I didn't mind the Russian/Japanese units in NA. I like the idea of having an over all theme for a release but adding a few extra pieces for flavour. If you're a Russian or Japanese player these units come in handy, but by not going over board with non theme pieces you get a good release.  |
|
| Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:45 am |
|
|
Posts: 885
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| boersma8 wrote: | Panzer II C. Certainly not the best tank, but nevertheless my favourite. Hard to say why. Guess because they've undersold it so much giving it the stats it has. AS should have been 7/7/6 and AV 5/4/3. That and double shot and excellent suspension actually would have made for quite a decent early war tank.....
PS: Isn't it possible to vote anymore????? |
The thread originator added an expiry date for the voting.
I feel that the Panzer II C should have another SA to better capture the feel of a 20mm at close range. Something like
Devestating fire: This unit gets +1 on each die roll for short range attacks against both infantry and vehicles. |
|
| Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:47 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| TorontoBizz wrote: | | boersma8 wrote: | Panzer II C. Certainly not the best tank, but nevertheless my favourite. Hard to say why. Guess because they've undersold it so much giving it the stats it has. AS should have been 7/7/6 and AV 5/4/3. That and double shot and excellent suspension actually would have made for quite a decent early war tank.....
PS: Isn't it possible to vote anymore????? |
The thread originator added an expiry date for the voting.
I feel that the Panzer II C should have another SA to better capture the feel of a 20mm at close range. Something like
Devestating fire: This unit gets +1 on each die roll for short range attacks against both infantry and vehicles. |
-1 on Cover Rolls at Short Range with higher AI stats might be a good alternative.
_________________
 |
|
| Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:50 am |
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| TorontoBizz wrote: | | boersma8 wrote: | Panzer II C. Certainly not the best tank, but nevertheless my favourite. Hard to say why. Guess because they've undersold it so much giving it the stats it has. AS should have been 7/7/6 and AV 5/4/3. That and double shot and excellent suspension actually would have made for quite a decent early war tank.....
PS: Isn't it possible to vote anymore????? |
The thread originator added an expiry date for the voting.
I feel that the Panzer II C should have another SA to better capture the feel of a 20mm at close range. Something like
Devestating fire: This unit gets +1 on each die roll for short range attacks against both infantry and vehicles. |
but even with crack shot you still wouldn't be able to hurt a Renault at short range, because its actual stats are 4/3/2 if I'm not mistaken. |
|
| Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:01 am |
|
|
Moderator (here to help you!)
Supreme AHF Trader
Posts: 2123
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Th Panzer II is not MEANT to fight other tanks. hir weapons are meant to attack soldiers and maybbe "soft" vehicles. If you use it as tank killer you deserrve to lose 
_________________
[img.]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Animated_gun_turret.gif[/img]
Lieber eine flotte Rote als die rote Flotte! |
|
| Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:25 am |
|
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Richter von Manthofen wrote: | | Th Panzer II is not MEANT to fight other tanks. hir weapons are meant to attack soldiers and maybbe "soft" vehicles. If you use it as tank killer you deserrve to lose |
Granted, but there's no reason it should be as bad as it is. Even a machine gun has equal or better (MG on US haltrack at long range) stats against vehicles. I feel it should be 5/4/3 and not 4/3/2. That's also what HHR gave it. You still need to be very lucky on your rolls-even at close range- against a 4/4 French tank, but it's not utterly impossible..... |
|
| Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:14 am |
|
|
Moderator (here to help you!)
Supreme AHF Trader
Posts: 2123
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Good point...
_________________
[img.]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Animated_gun_turret.gif[/img]
Lieber eine flotte Rote als die rote Flotte! |
|
| Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:02 am |
|
|
|
