| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which Early War Soviet Tank do you want to see? |
| T-37/38 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| T-40 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| T-60 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| BT-5 |
|
8% |
[ 4 ] |
| BT-7 |
|
32% |
[ 16 ] |
| KV-2 |
|
28% |
[ 14 ] |
| T-28 |
|
10% |
[ 5 ] |
| T-35 |
|
20% |
[ 10 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 49 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Posts: 885
|
|
|
Post subject: Early War Soviet Tanks
|
 |
|
| Which one are you hoping to see? |
|
 Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:35 pm |
|
|
Holding the line...
Posts: 1655
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
No T-35?
_________________
 |
|
| Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:07 pm |
|
|
Hellcat Commander
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 1084
|
|
|
| Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:14 pm |
|
|
Posts: 885
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Snippersly wrote: | | T-35 Ditto!! |
Sorry forgot to add the T-35! |
|
| Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:42 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 861
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
The BT-7 is still the best choice all around for any real use in pre-42 skirmish.
_________________
Remember-OWS-
AAM Scenario Creator, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, |
|
| Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:12 pm |
|
|
SOCCEROO FEVER
Posts: 6808
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
BT-7 can be usd for Spanish civil war too.
_________________
 |
|
| Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:22 pm |
|
|
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Posts: 1466
|
|
|
| Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:23 pm |
|
|
"My dear general, the war can now only be won by the politicians." Von Rundstedt to Kurt Meyer.
Posts: 1488
|
|
|
| Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:58 pm |
|
|
Nerdstradamus
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 1612
|
|
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:14 am |
|
|
Posts: 885
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Captain Morevo wrote: | | T-35 has been added. |
Thanks! I couldn't figure out how to edit that. |
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 12:56 am |
|
|
START THE PURPLE!
Posts: 623
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
DAMNIT!!! i marked the KV-2, but i meant to mark BT-7. Just in case your interested.
_________________
 |
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:17 am |
|
|
Posts: 885
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
BT-7 is getting a lot of votes.
I was looking at the V1 BT-7 and kinda of looks to scale with V2s. Does that make sense.
I voted for KV-2. It would be a monster of a tank.
SA - ignore firs damaged counter
- Blast
- Bombardment
The T-40 amphibious tank could be fun. Crossing river hexes would be usefull. |
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:21 am |
|
|
Holding the line...
Posts: 1655
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
The KV-2 was a dinosaur, but then again the T-35 was too. Both looked extremely cool, but only one proved itself to be an adequate piece of equipment. Oh, T-35.... 
_________________
|
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:42 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 861
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| TorontoBizz wrote: | BT-7 is getting a lot of votes.
I was looking at the V1 BT-7 and kinda of looks to scale with V2s. Does that make sense.
I voted for KV-2. It would be a monster of a tank.
SA - ignore firs damaged counter
- Blast
- Bombardment
The T-40 amphibious tank could be fun. Crossing river hexes would be usefull. |
I did the card a while ago, and many fellow player in my area liked it, so they bought Flames of War minis to go along.
_________________
Remember-OWS-
AAM Scenario Creator, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, |
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:57 am |
|
|
Afrika Korps
Posts: 1390
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
well that is a monster... for 1940 german standards.
I fell the AV values are a little high on long range... was that gun so good against armor at "long range"?
I voted T28, a tank we are missing for early war Barbarossa.
_________________
Custom AAM Maps & Counters here
 |
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:30 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 861
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| RedBaron wrote: | well that is a monster... for 1940 german standards.
I fell the AV values are a little high on long range... was that gun so good against armor at "long range"?
I voted T28, a tank we are missing for early war Barbarossa. |
Nah.... It's just that I liked the beast so much.
The main Armament was either
152 mm M1938/40 L24
The 152 mm gun could fire a 82lb APHE shell at a muzzle velocity of 1,400'/sec. That would be 124mm thick at 1000 meters.
So the real value would be more like AT: 10/8/6.
_________________
Remember-OWS-
AAM Scenario Creator, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, |
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:19 am |
|
|
Afrika Korps
Posts: 1390
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
is that an ironic message? if so be gentle with me, I am still learning the soviet guns step by step.
_________________
Custom AAM Maps & Counters here
|
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:18 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 861
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| RedBaron wrote: | | is that an ironic message? if so be gentle with me, I am still learning the soviet guns step by step. |
No Irony here, only more information on my own card modification I did awhile ago.
I am not a Ironic nor Displeasing person. 
_________________
Remember-OWS-
AAM Scenario Creator, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, |
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:53 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 4761
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
BT-7 was the obvious choice for me. I love the speed of it. The T-35 probably wouldn't fit in the tackle boxes. lol
KV-2 is really cool but kind of an enigma, it wasn't a good design, it was too heavy or top heavy and would crumble under the weight of the giant turret and get stuck on anything other than level ground and then couldn't really shoot its gun if not on a flat surface. It would have to have some serious negative SA's such as Poor Suspension as well as what ROWS card already has but it's gun was a beastly thing.
_________________
 |
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:15 pm |
|
|
Moderator (here to help you!)
Supreme AHF Trader
Posts: 2125
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
The best gun is iseless if you cant shoot it...
_________________
[img.]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/db/Animated_gun_turret.gif[/img]
Lieber eine flotte Rote als die rote Flotte! |
|
| Tue Aug 11, 2009 7:49 pm |
|
|
|
