| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sinker of Battleships
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Posts: 856
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
 |
|
And Mine- Rolls: (2d6)  
_________________
WAS 64/64
39-45 36/60 |
|
 Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:15 pm |
|
|
Sinker of Battleships
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Posts: 856
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I'll go second
_________________
WAS 64/64
39-45 36/60 |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 1:36 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| I'll Hold my position |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 3:54 pm |
|
|
Sinker of Battleships
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Posts: 856
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I'll move my char to one-space closer
_________________
WAS 64/64
39-45 36/60 |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:02 pm |
|
|
Sinker of Battleships
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Posts: 856
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Sorry, that was vague. I mean I'll move my Char so I'm directly N of you.
_________________
WAS 64/64
39-45 36/60 |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:03 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Understood.
Axis Assault
Nevelwurfer fires on Char
Rolls: (7d6)     |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:02 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Pbbbbbbt!!
To avoid that hull mounted Gun I'll advance SS Storm trooper into your hex. |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:04 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Type 92 advanced to B10 |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:14 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| your Shot |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:14 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
You forgot to list faceing so I put you in direction of travel just to speed up, and post my turn. Let me know if that was not the case. |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:37 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Faceing will make a difference, as you will have a shot at the Type 92 with your hull gun. If you want to declare same faceing as your previous position I won't kabitz. Friendly Game  |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:41 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Hey I was just wondering, Since the this is the end of round seven are going to round 8 due to contesting the objective or are we going to call it a game and count up points? That would make a difference with the advancing of my Type 92 if you had chosen the South East Faceing. |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:34 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Personaly I would like to play it out. But I understand if your strategy was to Contest the last round. |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:36 pm |
|
|
Posts: 9281
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Grenzewolf wrote: | | Hey I was just wondering, Since the this is the end of round seven are going to round 8 due to contesting the objective or are we going to call it a game and count up points? That would make a difference with the advancing of my Type 92 if you had chosen the South East Faceing. |
Unless you both agree on a houserule, you should use the official rule, which says that you now check winner of objective on every next turn, until you reach end of turn 10. Then you'll have to count points.
_________________
 
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:42 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Thanks ND, |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:44 pm |
|
|
Sinker of Battleships
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Posts: 856
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
We'll use the official rule. And I'd like my hull-mounted shot on the MG.
Here we go..........
Char on SS stormtrooper.
Rolls: (7d6)
_________________
WAS 64/64
39-45 36/60 |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:44 pm |
|
|
Sinker of Battleships
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Posts: 856
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
That was very irritating. Hull-mounted cannon on MG-
Rolls: (7d6)
_________________
WAS 64/64
39-45 36/60 |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:46 pm |
|
|
Sinker of Battleships
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
Posts: 856
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
So, misses all around. Here's my init-
Rolls: (2d6)
_________________
WAS 64/64
39-45 36/60 |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:47 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Ok here is my Init.
Rolls: (2d6)
if needed
Rolls: (2d6) |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:55 pm |
|
|
Posts: 360
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
here we go again  |
|
| Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:55 pm |
|
|
|
