| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject: Evzone [APPROVED & LOCKED]
|
 |
|
(0-1) 8/ (2-3) 6/ (4) 5
(0-1) 1
Speed 1
Defense 4/7
Cover 4
CA3
ALPINE--Enemy units get -1 Attack Die against this unit when it is in a hill or mountain hex. This unit ignores Movement Rolls except when crossing a river.
Cost 4
Date 7/36
_________________
Last edited by Sharpe on Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:38 pm; edited 5 times in total |
|
 Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:31 am |
|
|
SOCCEROO FEVER
Posts: 6808
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
ohh i like the the -1 can it apply to the Romanian mountain troops too.
_________________
 |
|
| Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:36 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
It's my standard mountain troop ability. I'll get to the Vanatori soon.
_________________
|
|
| Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:37 am |
|
|
Posts: 9281
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Would it be better phrased as " roll 1 less attack die " instead of " get -1 attack die"? Maybe the latter can be confused with " get -1 on each die" which is also common in other SAs. Not sure. Just wondering.
_________________
 
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:47 am |
|
|
Posts: 9281
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Also, why specifically the 2/39 regiment? Would other evzones have different stats?
And a nice image for the card maker. Doing their famous charge against the Julia division and yelling their battlecry "Aera".
_________________
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:52 am |
|
|
SOCCEROO FEVER
Posts: 6808
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
where is there pretty skirts 
_________________
|
|
| Fri Jan 09, 2009 2:56 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I used the 2/39 for the Sharpedia unit. The reason is lost in the mists of history. As I learn more about other Evzones, I would make different cards.
_________________
|
|
| Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:01 am |
|
|
Posts: 9281
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I see. Then, we'll need specialised photo for each of the regiments. Hm, that will be a bit tough.
Btw, for Raevski:
The nice 1920s skirts gave way to the more boring 1940s look 
1920s
1940s
_________________
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:07 am |
|
|
Posts: 9281
|
|
|
| Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:07 am |
|
|
SOCCEROO FEVER
Posts: 6808
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Ohh well at least they have funky shoes
_________________
|
|
| Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:11 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
We're going to have to use units as names if we keep updating units over the course of the war.
_________________
|
|
| Fri Jan 09, 2009 4:19 am |
|
|
Posts: 585
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
_________________
There are no desperate situations, there are only desperate people.
Heinz Guderian |
|
| Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:23 pm |
|
|
Posts: 428
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sharpe wrote: | | We're going to have to use units as names if we keep updating units over the course of the war. |
Well, not if we have other better alternatives like "Carcano Riflemen" or "Stormfusiliers" or whatever. These names are a little more generalized than units as names. |
|
| Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:42 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Amandil wrote: | | Sharpe wrote: | | We're going to have to use units as names if we keep updating units over the course of the war. |
Well, not if we have other better alternatives like "Carcano Riflemen" or "Stormfusiliers" or whatever. These names are a little more generalized than units as names. |
See thread on naming decision.
_________________
|
|
| Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:45 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
AoD--> Great job.
1. I don't think the Greeks used the "th" after numbers. We would read this as 2nd Batt of 39 th Reg, but it's actually the 2nd evzone rgt and 39th ingf regt. ND will set us straight.
2. Please change 2nd SA to "Enemy units roll 1 fewer Attack Die . . . "
Thanks
_________________
|
|
| Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:57 am |
|
|
Rehabbing from my plasticrack addiction!
Posts: 688
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Fixed name, pic and SA text.
and here is a suggestion for a name:
This gives us the flavor of the specific unit (Evzone) with out naming a specific regiment. Using Regiment in the title is a little confusing considering that it is a fire team of 4-5 guys. Also, I am not completely up to speed on my Evzone history, but what if, for example, the 2/39 never fought in a certain battle or against a certain opponent, that may not be a big deal but some people may see that as a historical snafu. I'm not trying to reopen the naming debate, just make a suggestion for a small modification. Anyways, just my opinion, you know what they say about those!
_________________
Nuts! - General Anthony McAuliffe
 |
|
| Thu Jan 15, 2009 3:08 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sharpe wrote: |
1. I don't think the Greeks used the "th" after numbers.
|
Even though I was stupid enough to put it in the title. 
_________________
|
|
| Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:24 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Card looks good and good suggestion about the name.
_________________
|
|
| Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:25 pm |
|
|
Posts: 9281
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Actually, in WoTC nomenclature it's "... one less attack die ...".
Why is the image b&w?!
_________________
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:48 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
"fewer" is correct English Grammar
Fewer is used for discrete things "I want fewer lumps of sugar."
Less is used when you can't actually count the object "I want less sugar."
I would prefer not to leave behind a legacy of illiteracy.
_________________
|
|
| Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:52 pm |
|
|
|
