| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Posts: 906
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
 |
|
both disrupted
_________________
 |
|
 Mon May 19, 2008 12:05 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Det Inf (B1) vs FJ
Rolls: (6d6)    
cover Rolls: (1d6)
_________________
 |
|
| Mon May 19, 2008 12:08 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Det Inf (D1) vs FJ
Rolls: (9d6) 
cover Rolls: (1d6)
_________________
|
|
| Mon May 19, 2008 12:09 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Das Spiel ist kaput, I believe.
Thanks for a great game. I was scared to death of that plane.
Do you know the other Viennese guy on the boards? Richter von Manthofen
_________________
|
|
| Mon May 19, 2008 12:12 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I have to leave for school. Talk to you later.
My wife wanted to know what you are studying.
Thanks again.
_________________
|
|
| Mon May 19, 2008 12:13 pm |
|
|
Posts: 906
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Hi...
yeah you will hold the objective in turn 7, that was clear. But i saved my last bomb for turn7, its important for our 2nd game with how many units you'll win.
It's 6xDI (24pts) vs Me110 (17pts)....
I drop my last bomb to one (not important which one) DI in cover:
Rolls: (8d6)  hits on 3+
cover
Rolls: (1d6) cover on 6
_________________
|
|
| Mon May 19, 2008 12:19 pm |
|
|
Posts: 906
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
K one DI in turn 7 down...
You win, congratulations. You had exactly the right army to deal with me. the cavalry for the dig in sniper, much infantry with steely resolve and almost no infantry at my side to attack your ones twice to egal that cool SA and the flak of course so i couldnt attack your cavalry with my plane in turn 1, which was the death of the sniper later....
Cool game and congratulations again! You did not do a single mistake as far as i see it. It's a 20pts to 17pts win in the end. I guess you lead with 4 pts then (1pt for victory).
Btw i study political sciences and globalhistory, with emphasis Near East and Germany from Weimaer republic to 1945.
Yeah i know him. not personally right now, but we have a AAM trade pending, so i will meet him soon i think.
You leave to school? What are u studying.
_________________
|
|
| Mon May 19, 2008 12:27 pm |
|
|
Posts: 1517
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
[quote="Westentaschenschlachti"]Cool game and congratulations again! You did not do a single mistake as far as i see it. It's a 20pts to 17pts win in the end. I guess you lead with 4 pts then (1pt for victory). [quote]
Sharpe wins by 3 pts (the minimum 1pt is earned, when smaller army beats larger army).
Now you choose out of 3 last available maps. I offer following system
Roll 1-2: Britain/Italy Eastern Africa 1940 (5)
Roll 3-4: RUS/JAP Mandchuria 1939 (1&1-3)
Roll 5-6: CHI/JAP China 1939 (1&4-6)
Sharpe takes Axis, anybody of you can roll for the map (select at random or let the loser roll) 
_________________
 * Let the others to grow |
|
| Mon May 19, 2008 12:44 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Thank you for your kind words. It was an exciting game.
I teach world history and English. Today's lecture was 1934 to 1945 in Europe.
A couple of questions first.
Where is the info on bombs?
Why do the bombs hit on 3+? I thought that was his expert strafer modification. Bombs only hit on 4+ earlier in the game.
Why do 5 bomb hits destroy a unit with Steely Resolve 2?
I'm not trying to be pedantic, I just want a clear idea of the game for the future.
Roll for map:
Rolls: (1d6)
I like the units, but do miss the Sharpedia. It would be nice to have 50 Polish units from which to choose.
_________________
|
|
| Mon May 19, 2008 9:45 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sharpe wrote: | Thank you for your kind words. It was an exciting game.
I teach world history and English. Today's lecture was 1934 to 1945 in Europe.
A couple of questions first.
Where is the info on bombs?
Why do the bombs hit on 3+? I thought that was his expert strafer modification. Bombs only hit on 4+ earlier in the game.
Why do 5 bomb hits destroy a unit with Steely Resolve 2?
I'm not trying to be pedantic, I just want a clear idea of the game for the future.
Roll for map:
Rolls: (1d6)
I like the units, but do miss the Sharpedia. It would be nice to have 50 Polish units from which to choose. |
I'm sorry. I didn't read the whole message before I put in the roll. Feel free to reroll.
_________________
|
|
| Mon May 19, 2008 9:47 pm |
|
|
Posts: 1517
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sharpe wrote: | A couple of questions first.
Where is the info on bombs? Why do the bombs hit on 3+? I thought that was his expert strafer modification. Bombs only hit on 4+ earlier in the game.
Why do 5 bomb hits destroy a unit with Steely Resolve 2?
I'm not trying to be pedantic, I just want a clear idea of the game for the future. |
Info on the bombs is in the HHR Rules compendium I sent you by e-mail last time  Bombs hit normally on 5+ (Inaccurate -1 as everything falling from the sky - like artillery shells). I.e. mistake of the Westen - his Me110 should hit on 4+ with bombs (application of SA Expert strafing).
But 5 successful rolls on bombs = 10 hits (SA Shrapnel, remember? ).
_________________
* Let the others to grow |
|
| Tue May 20, 2008 6:12 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
That's clear.
We can't use concealment in this tournament?
The rules you sent me (Rules 2008) don't mention bombs at all.
_________________
|
|
| Tue May 20, 2008 7:00 pm |
|
|
Posts: 1517
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sharpe wrote: | That's clear.
We can't use concealment in this tournament?
The rules you sent me (Rules 2008) don't mention bombs at all. |
File RulesHHRen_2008ver4.doc ? Or I am terrbly wrong and I have sent you some other file?
_________________
* Let the others to grow |
|
| Tue May 20, 2008 7:22 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sindor wrote: | | Sharpe wrote: | That's clear.
We can't use concealment in this tournament?
The rules you sent me (Rules 2008) don't mention bombs at all. |
File RulesHHRen_2008ver4.doc ? Or I am terrbly wrong and I have sent you some other file? |
You did not send me version 4.
_________________
|
|
| Tue May 20, 2008 9:05 pm |
|
|
Posts: 906
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sharpe wrote: | Thank you for your kind words. It was an exciting game.
I teach world history and English. Today's lecture was 1934 to 1945 in Europe.
|
Are the kids interested in this? How is the tendency opposite Germany and Austria in US teenagers heads today? Do you think there are still reserves against these countries or is a feeling "that happened so long ago" dominating?
Quite interesting for me
_________________
|
|
| Wed May 21, 2008 5:29 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Westentaschenschlachti wrote: | | Sharpe wrote: | Thank you for your kind words. It was an exciting game.
I teach world history and English. Today's lecture was 1934 to 1945 in Europe.
|
Are the kids interested in this? How is the tendency opposite Germany and Austria in US teenagers heads today? Do you think there are still reserves against these countries or is a feeling "that happened so long ago" dominating?
Quite interesting for me |
My 16 year-old son is very interested in history, especially WW2. Most other teenagers don't really care. They don't know the difference between Goering and Gilgamesh.
Very few people here under the age of sixty hold any ill will against Germany. A few veterans do, but many of them admit that they liked the German people very much. My mother-in-law despises Germans, but she grew up in Southampton, England and got nightly visits from the Luftwaffe. If Americans think of Austrians at all, they picture the von Trapp family surrounded by kangaroos.
_________________
|
|
| Thu May 22, 2008 12:26 am |
|
|
Posts: 1517
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sharpe wrote: | | My 16 year-old son is very interested in history, especially WW2. Most other teenagers don't really care. They don't know the difference between Goering and Gilgamesh. |
It's a pity. But, on the other side, I do not know all your presidents and 51 states neither (I can remember cca 10 of each group)
_________________
* Let the others to grow |
|
| Thu May 22, 2008 6:02 am |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sindor wrote: | | Sharpe wrote: | | My 16 year-old son is very interested in history, especially WW2. Most other teenagers don't really care. They don't know the difference between Goering and Gilgamesh. |
It's a pity. But, on the other side, I do not know all your presidents and 51 states neither (I can remember cca 10 of each group) |
Only 50 states, actually, plus our various colonies. I am starting a movement to annex the Czech Republic so we can start mining supermodels from its pulchritudinous female population.
_________________
|
|
| Thu May 22, 2008 4:00 pm |
|
|
Posts: 1517
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sharpe wrote: | | Only 50 states, actually, plus our various colonies. I am starting a movement to annex the Czech Republic so we can start mining supermodels from its pulchritudinous female population. |
And what bu Area 51? You cannot hide it forever  Is "pulchritudinous" a vulgarity or just a sort of Black Adder new-speak? 
_________________
* Let the others to grow |
|
| Thu May 22, 2008 4:55 pm |
|
|
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 2936
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sindor wrote: | | Sharpe wrote: | | Only 50 states, actually, plus our various colonies. I am starting a movement to annex the Czech Republic so we can start mining supermodels from its pulchritudinous female population. |
And what bu Area 51? You cannot hide it forever Is "pulchritudinous" a vulgarity or just a sort of Black Adder new-speak? |
It means "characterized by having great physical beauty." From Greek, I believe.
_________________
|
|
| Thu May 22, 2008 8:50 pm |
|
|
|
