Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index Axis & Allies ForuMINI
The largest forum on the Web specialised in the Axis & Allies miniatures and War At Sea games
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index

AAM normal AAM disrupted AAM crackshot WAS normal WAS crippled WAS Torpedo
The probability of at least successes with dice is %
The AAM/WAS calculator works only if you are LOGGED IN and have JAVASCRIPT enabled. Known bug: doesn't work for more successes than dice

Folgore C.202 and Halifax - Rich's latest blog
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> WAS General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Andreas3



AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Posts: 627

Location: Store Heddinge, Denmark

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 4:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EvilKobra wrote:
IIRC, Halifax bombers were also involved in many of the raids against Tirpitz. Not that they did any good.

But yeah, mostly they were used for ASW and recon duties.




but were they succesfull??? I mean...they've must have been very usefull otherwise I dont think they would've been included in this game... Question


_________________


WKFC

IJNCVLF needs YOU! join the crusade; sign up TODAY!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AG124


Grey Wolf


Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 235

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 4:46 pm    Post subject: Blog Entry Reply with quote

BTW - Could someone post a link to the actual blog entry, as well as the response discussing the French ships? I am an idiot, and can't find them. Embarassed Thanks.
_________________
AAM:
BS, 21/48, 29 pieces
S2, 35/45, 89 pieces
CS, 31/45, 60 pieces
DD, 35/45, 58 pieces
RS, 42/45, 92 pieces
39, 60/60, 177 pieces
NA, 60/60, 131 pieces
WaS:
Set I, 64/64, 231 pieces
Task Force, 60/60 - 108 pieces
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aquarius
'Good Cop' Admin
Will be busy as &^%$ for the next two weeks. Don't expect me to be able to do a whole lot.

AHF Silver-Rated Trader


Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 3046

Location: San Diego, CA

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right here:

http://www.gleemax.com/Comms/Page...aspx?blogid=4142&userid=12620

Just click on the post that you want to view, and the comments will be shown.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 3235


PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

oh, thanks for digging this up guys, maybe it's just in my head, but it seems like discussion has been going down for a bit, not any more, this is cool news.

First, Italian fighter, I think a great move, would have just been lame to have a major power that you couldn't really play by itself.  Is there any chance that this is a repaint of either the sea hurricane or the german fighter?  Either way it will go great with the Italian torp bomber and let those Ambras and MTB's survive long enough to fire a shot.

Next, Halifax could be cool, other patrol bombers are torpedo oriented, was this unit ever fitted with torps?

Finally, those Tribal destroyers, does his comment mean that they will have a 7 in close range gunnery?  That could certainly go well with Javelin, one with smoke and torps, the other gets rid of enemy destroyers (and cruisers too).

And, even though the French sub won't be Sourcouf, its still nice that the French will be playable by themselves, I'm glad.

This news made my weekend.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
babs



Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 724

Location: Utrecht, the Netherlands

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

swarbs wrote:
oh, thanks for digging this up guys, maybe it's just in my head, but it seems like discussion has been going down for a bit, not any more, this is cool news.

First, Italian fighter, I think a great move, would have just been lame to have a major power that you couldn't really play by itself.  Is there any chance that this is a repaint of either the sea hurricane or the german fighter?  Either way it will go great with the Italian torp bomber and let those Ambras and MTB's survive long enough to fire a shot.


Yes, excellent! I like to play my games historically, but with no fighters its hard to pull.

Quote:

Next, Halifax could be cool, other patrol bombers are torpedo oriented, was this unit ever fitted with torps?


Handley Page Halifax. I don't think they carried torpedos, they were the planes that bombed the Tirpitz (not the one that sunk it, those were lancaster B1 specials, two years later)!

Additionally, RAF coastal command used them for ASW.

Quote:

Finally, those Tribal destroyers, does his comment mean that they will have a 7 in close range gunnery?  That could certainly go well with Javelin, one with smoke and torps, the other gets rid of enemy destroyers (and cruisers too).


Seven dice for the tribal? Thats about as much firepower as a 6 inch cruiser. It only had 4.7 inch guns...!

Quote:

And, even though the French sub won't be Sourcouf, its still nice that the French will be playable by themselves, I'm glad.

This news made my weekend.


Which are eligible candidates? Anyone want to make a guess?

Babs out!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jesse_James
.
.
A.P.C.


Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 1902

Location: The Tool Shed

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot

chufted
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kommandant




Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 167


PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

C.202
best news in quite a while for me Very Happy
_________________

if anyone remember from what website these
images were taken from, please pm me the website
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
weedsrock2



AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Posts: 787

Location: IA

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 9:20 pm    Post subject: French sub information Reply with quote

Here is a listing of French submarines and their fate.

It is sad the so many of them had to be scuttled.

http://www.uboat.net/allies/warsh...s.html?type=Submarine&navy=FR
_________________

The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care"
Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fabikaze

WAS Axis player


Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 89

Location: Verona - Italy

PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MC 200 and 202 in Action

http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=wv7P4eJ0V-E&NR=1
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Diamondback
.
.
Caesar Americanus II HARD CORPS: Founding Dozen

AHF Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 742

Location: IJNCVLF Forward Command Post--WotC's Backyard, Seattle

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 5:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Next week while I'm looking up Oakland/Juneaus, I'll also research the various French sub populations and design-lineages, see what I can WAG for logical candidate classes.
_________________
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
"I shall return..."
IJNCVLF Reserve: 'Cuz my Avengers wanna bust more'n just battleships...

Naval: W@S 64/64  TF 59/60 (#60 in talks)
28/52 at "Revised Historical Limits"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ericjohn
.
.

AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 944

Location: Seattle, WA

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I hope Halifax has a good anti-sub SA, presumably related to either detecting the sub or "keeping it submerged"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AG124


Grey Wolf


Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 235

Location: Canada

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 2:24 pm    Post subject: French Submarines - Guesses Reply with quote

I would guess the French sub would be either Requin class, or Pascal class. Both classes had a large number of vessels commissioned, some were salvaged by the Axis (although not used, I think), and some were transferred to the Free French. They seem like good candidates to me.
_________________
AAM:
BS, 21/48, 29 pieces
S2, 35/45, 89 pieces
CS, 31/45, 60 pieces
DD, 35/45, 58 pieces
RS, 42/45, 92 pieces
39, 60/60, 177 pieces
NA, 60/60, 131 pieces
WaS:
Set I, 64/64, 231 pieces
Task Force, 60/60 - 108 pieces
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeuralDream
'Head Cop' Admin


Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 4476

Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You know that there are several subs already in the forumini navies, right?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 3235


PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 3:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NeuralDream wrote:
You know that there are several subs already in the forumini navies, right?


Yes, we know, but those don't come with a little plastic submarine you push around the table.  Also, it's just fun to speculate.

I don't know how long its been down there, but I see the Task Force box has been added to the counter on the bottom of the page.  That's a cool addition, haven't seen it before.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
weedsrock2



AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 23 Dec 2007
Posts: 787

Location: IA

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Andreas3 wrote:
EvilKobra wrote:
IIRC, Halifax bombers were also involved in many of the raids against Tirpitz. Not that they did any good.

But yeah, mostly they were used for ASW and recon duties.


but were they succesfull??? I mean...they've must have been very usefull otherwise I dont think they would've been included in this game... Question


According to the site at the link below Halifax's sank 3 U-boats and assisting in sinking 6 others. In the text they also mention sinking an Italian submarine. Halifax's carried 8 depth charges, and later they carried 600 lbs of anti-submarine bombs.

http://www.uboat.net/allies/aircraft/halifax.htm
_________________

The IJN Carrier Liberation Force - "Because We Care"
Join the IJNCVLF. Service Guarantees Citizenship!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Arcos



Joined: 25 Feb 2008
Posts: 121


PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just out of curiosity, would you rather have an anti-air cruiser like the UK's Dido class, or a land based fighter? I think I would actually rather have a Flakschiff like the Niobe than land based fighter to protect my Bismarck. It's a shame the Italians didn't make an AA cruiser.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_anti-aircraft_cruiser_Niobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LoneWolf



Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Posts: 162


PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 7:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NICE JOB AND THANKS DICK! Very HappyVery HappyVery HappyVery Happy

Tribal class destroyer keeps Australia in the game!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOOT WOOT.




PS. I love my job, completely random addition. Exclamation
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LoneWolf



Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Posts: 162


PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 8:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Duck Crusader wrote:
Hmmm, British patrol bomber, Italian fighter, Tribal destroyers. We'd pretty much guessed a lot of that, but it is nice to see the Italian fighter confirmed.


the excitement just got better for I.

I'm all for the tribal class destroyer.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LoneWolf



Joined: 24 Jan 2008
Posts: 162


PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's the Halifax bomber!! All I care about.

I should add, to me it is as good as having the lancaster in the game for I.

She also can double for an aussie plane, i think I am more then happy waiting to see the bristol beaufighter now.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fabikaze

WAS Axis player


Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 89

Location: Verona - Italy

PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 9:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arcos wrote:
It's a shame the Italians didn't make an AA cruiser.


No italian AA cruisers were in service at the end of the war for the Regia Marina on 08/09/43, date of italian shame surrender and "change of ally", with Regia Marina that had to go to Malta and run aground his beaches, but they was building them.

Like the Aquila carrer was not ended, they were building two AA cruisers, the Etna and Vesuvio.

As i wrote in the post about destroyers, few steel to end works and few oil to use better the navy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> WAS General Discussion All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Current Time
All War At Sea Cards
* FORUMINI ADMIRALS deck*
AAM official REVISED cards: Sets 3 - 7
Announcements
Dreadnought Rising promo no1
Forumini Wikipedia projects
New AAM Rules are up!
Random Image
Friends
Official WoTC website
Richard Baker's Blog
Old Avalon Hill forum
Le Forum de A&ANM
Axis&Allies.org
Riverside Gaming
Le Forum de Blackguard
Miniature Trading
Top posters
packertim 8277
Okie 3725
swarbs 3235
jfkziegler 2544
Duck Crusader 2520
RAEVSKI 2194
DaJudge 2139
The_lucky_Y 1997
Jesse_James 1902
IJN Fuso 1772
Mad Ghost/0331 1574
Gross Admiral Raeder 1572
PrideoftheRoyalNavy 1281
afilter 1053
Campbjj 1036
Polish_Cavalryman 1014
Jameson 988
Cmdr_Clint 971
Lt_Vleclopity 955
ericjohn 944
Field Marshal PF 905
Blackeagle 904
Sharpe 871
Schlachtschiff Bismarck 867
Sink the Bismark 852
Cpt. John Miller 814
Sindor 787
weedsrock2 787
drittal 760
Diamondback 742

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum