:: Home :: FAQ :: Search :: Memberlist :: Usergroups :: Join! (free) :: Profile :: Log in to check your private messages :: Log in ::
WAS Set II (complete list)
Page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 34, 35, 36  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> WAS General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
AG124

.
 
Grey Wolf


Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 411




Post subject: Soviet BB? Reply with quote
I seem to remember that in one of the older Set II threads on the Wizards forum, there was some discussion of a Soviet BB, and it seemed to have been confirmed by Richard himself (although I seem unable to find any such confirmation myself). I would personally rather not see any Soviet ships added in this set, but I would still be interested in finding out whether or not the rumors were actually true.

Also, I'll keep looking for the posts mentioning the Soviet BB, and post a link if I am successful.
PostThu Jan 03, 2008 6:54 pm
View user's profile Send private message
Mad Ghost/0331

.
 
Silver-Rated Trader

Joined: 28 Dec 2007

Posts: 1888




Post subject: Re: Soviet BB? Reply with quote
AG124 wrote:
I seem to remember that in one of the older Set II threads on the Wizards forum, there was some discussion of a Soviet BB, and it seemed to have been confirmed by Richard himself (although I seem unable to find any such confirmation myself). I would personally rather not see any Soviet ships added in this set, but I would still be interested in finding out whether or not the rumors were actually true.

Also, I'll keep looking for the posts mentioning the Soviet BB, and post a link if I am successful.


ok. now why would they make a Soviet BB anytime soon? The best the Soviet Navy did during the war was floating artillery for the Red Army. The Graff Zeppelin and the Aquilla should both float first, since the Kriegsmarine and Regia Marina actually conducted Naval operations. soviet ships would be cool, just further down the production pipeline.
_________________


An appeal to fear never finds an echo in German hearts.
Otto von Bismarck

http://riversidegaming.myfastforum.org/forum3.php
PostFri Jan 04, 2008 4:05 am
View user's profile Send private message
swarbs

.
 Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007



Posts: 5195




Post subject: Reply with quote
Soviet ships don't really make sense, I agree.  But, I can see how the company could be attracted to them so that people could combine the land and sea miniatures in thier own scenarios or even to be a part of a huge Axis and Allies board game that is miniatures on the tactical level, they've already done that on the website but I assume the soviet starting ships (a sub and a transport I think) were left out of tactical combat.  Also, someone posted on the other forum about the british sending the Russians an old (r class I think) battleship which would make it a possible repaint opportunity.
_________________
PostFri Jan 04, 2008 2:22 pm
View user's profile Send private message
AG124

.
 
Grey Wolf


Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 411




Post subject: Soviet Warships Reply with quote
Yes, the UK transferred the Royal Sovereign to the USSR in late 1944; she was renamed Archangelsk (Archangel) and served with the Soviet navy until she was returned to the UK for scrapping in 1949. As a sidenote, Bernard Fitzsimons wrote in his excellent series of Weapons and Warfare Encyclopedias back in the 1970s that when the BB was returned, her mess decks were "covered in human excrement" and every single gun on board had still been kept loaded (he described this as a "bizarre insight into the Russian character," but then again, the Cold War was still on in the 70s...). Also, of course, the Soviets received a US Omaha class CL (Milwaukee/Murmansk), a number of UK 'Town class DDs (former US Clemson and Wickes class), a few Liberty ships from the US, and a number of older British subs (all S or V class). I guess there would be some potential for repaints there as well.

Anyway, I don't really think there will be any Soviet ships in Set II now that only half of it can consist of new molds - while explaining the reasons for the repaints, Richard mentioned that a tentative list for new ships had been drafted before management informed him that the new set could only consist of 30 new molds; perhaps this original list included a few Soviet ships, and a leak somewhere was the basis for the posts I remembered seeing (but can't seem to find now). At any rate, I would prefer to see the Soviets released later in the series myself, if they were to be included in WaS at all. There are far too few precious new ship slots in Set II to include the Soviet Navy, which is of somewhat limited usefulness ingame, IMHO (although future sets will include reprints too, I assume the proportion of them in relation to the overall number of units will be less than in Set II, where the team was caught off guard by the success of the series).
PostFri Jan 04, 2008 9:38 pm
View user's profile Send private message
JarheadBinks

 Truth, Duty, Valour.


Joined: 04 Jan 2008

Posts: 9




Post subject: Reply with quote
BB-55 wrote:
The IJN BB I'm hoping for is either the Ise/Hyuga or the Huso/Yamasiro.  6 Main turrets!! WOOHOO!!


Don't forget the Arkansas (BB33) had 6 (count 'em) centre line turrets also. - of course they were only 12" guns.

/$0.02
_________________
TDV - Don

PostFri Jan 04, 2008 9:45 pm
View user's profile Send private message
EssexSims

 
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 96




Post subject: Japanese and Soviet BB's Reply with quote
1)  Call me a cynic, but the inclusion of the Russian's (at least in Set 2) would seem to me just a way to make money.  The more nations you include in the game, the more sets they can release down the road since once you get the BB's, you need aircraft, cruisers, and destroyers to escort/support it.  We're already going to see that with the Dutch, but at least they actually fought some major naval battles in WWII.

2) As far as the Japanese BB.  Given the gap between Yamato, a great ship but a huge drain at 70 points and the Kongo, glorified BC's that have a real tough time standing up to the allied BB's, I would like to see Nagato as well.  

I like the look of the Fuso's and Hyuga's, but I really think the Japanese could use the 16" guns and upgraded armor the Nagato offered.  To me Fuso, Hyuga, et al would be roughly equal to Tennesee.  Nagato could put up a reasonable fight vs. Rodney and Richelieu.
PostSat Jan 05, 2008 12:27 am
View user's profile Send private message
Jesse_James

.
 Illuminated Insanity


Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 4339




Post subject: Re: Japanese and Soviet BB's Reply with quote
EssexSims wrote:
  would seem to me just a way to make money.  The more nations you include in the game, the more sets they can release


DID NO ONE LISTEN TO ME IN THE OLD FORUMS?

MUST I REPEAT MY SELF?

_________________
Always Flying. Always Fighting. RIP JIMMY.

PostSat Jan 05, 2008 6:33 am
View user's profile Send private message
Okie

 
USS OKLAHOMA BB-37


Joined: 29 Dec 2007

Posts: 6568




Post subject: IJN BB: Reply with quote
I'd like to see the Nagato in set 2 myself along with the KG5th, a friend made me a Graf Zephlin out of a Akagi, painted North Sea camo and also the planes, a naval stuka,109 and a bi-plane but can't thank of the designation right now. They are all really cool!!!  He's modified a lot of the ships to make other's and has done a very fine job,planes also like a B-17 out of a Condor ect.    Okie
PostSat Jan 05, 2008 6:50 am
View user's profile Send private message
ericjohn

 
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 944




Post subject: Re: Japanese and Soviet BB's Reply with quote
EssexSims wrote:
As far as the Japanese BB.  Given the gap between Yamato, a great ship but a huge drain at 70 points and the Kongo, glorified BC's that have a real tough time standing up to the allied BB's, I would like to see Nagato as well.  


Yes I totally agree, Fuso will be cool when it comes, but Nagato better fills a gap in the lineup, so I expect Nagato in Set2 and an older BB such as Fuso in Set3
PostSat Jan 05, 2008 9:11 pm
View user's profile Send private message
ericjohn

 
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 944




Post subject: Re: Soviet Warships Reply with quote
AG124 wrote:
Anyway, I don't really think there will be any Soviet ships in Set II now that only half of it can consist of new molds - while explaining the reasons for the repaints, Richard mentioned that a tentative list for new ships had been drafted before management informed him that the new set could only consist of 30 new molds; perhaps this original list included a few Soviet ships, and a leak somewhere was the basis for the posts I remembered seeing (but can't seem to find now). At any rate, I would prefer to see the Soviets released later in the series myself, if they were to be included in WaS at all. There are far too few precious new ship slots in Set II to include the Soviet Navy, which is of somewhat limited usefulness ingame, IMHO (although future sets will include reprints too, I assume the proportion of them in relation to the overall number of units will be less than in Set II, where the team was caught off guard by the success of the series).


Yes I had guessed that SU would be in Set II, but I've been persuaded by folks on the boards that it's unlikely, since we are already getting Dutch and Canadians. I totally expect Soviets to come however, so they will probably be the new nation represented in Set III. And I agree they will use Murmansk and Arkangel to leverage scults for other navies as well as Soviet (my current guess includes Murmansk-sister Richmond, which would set the table for that to be a repaint - and Rich indicated that Set III will have early-war tilt, so maybe Royal Oak and Arkangel both?)
PostSat Jan 05, 2008 9:13 pm
View user's profile Send private message
EssexSims

 
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 96




Post subject: Set III Reply with quote
I love the "early war slant".  I've always liked the more anachrostic look of the pre-war ships like the American 4 stack Destroyers and CL's; the pre-long lance Japanese Destroyers with their big forecastles, and the WWI era Battleships like Fuso and the British R-class.
PostSun Jan 06, 2008 12:23 am
View user's profile Send private message
Jesse_James

.
 Illuminated Insanity


Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 4339




Post subject: Reply with quote
I don't mind the Russian. Actually I look forward to them. They are just as usless as some other ships we will be getting like the tirpitz.  Wink

Yamato did not exactly do a whole lot either.  Rolling Eyes

As for a Russian BB, did not hear anything but would not doubt it.
Not sure if they are in the new set or not.  Confused
_________________
Always Flying. Always Fighting. RIP JIMMY.

PostSun Jan 06, 2008 6:25 pm
View user's profile Send private message
Highball

 
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 23 Dec 2007

Posts: 187




Post subject: Reply with quote
I am a little confused about the report of the new sculpt Japanese Destroyer. I cannot find any listing of a Akizuki-class destroyer. I found  .....

Asakaze (Asakaze class)
Amatsukaze (Isokaze class)
Akikaze (Minekaze class)
Ajisai (Wakatake class)
Ayanami, Asagiri, Amagiri & Akebono (Fubuki class)
Akatsuki (Akatsuki class)
Ariake (Hatsuharu class)
Asashio, Arashio, Asagumo & Arare (Asashio class)
Akigumo, Asashimo & Akishimo (Yugumo class)
Akitsuki (Akitsuki class)

..... but I have not found a Akizuki.

HELP!

(corrected spelling 1/14/08)


Last edited by Highball on Mon Jan 14, 2008 10:05 pm; edited 1 time in total
PostSun Jan 13, 2008 12:25 am
View user's profile Send private message
Highball

 
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 23 Dec 2007

Posts: 187




Post subject: Reply with quote
OK ..... after looking at other websites I found the class, but I wonder why this website (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/japan/ijn-ships-ww2.htm) does not list them at all. It is strange.
PostSun Jan 13, 2008 12:54 am
View user's profile Send private message
AG124

.
 
Grey Wolf


Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 411




Post subject: Akizuki Not Listed on Page Reply with quote
Probably just an omission when the page was first compiled - you should send the webmasters an e-mail and ask why the class hasn't been listed there. Confused Or you could just let it go, I guess.
_________________
AAM
BS 48/48 (106)
S2 45/45 (139)
CS 45/45 (111)
DD 44/45 (89)
RS 45/45 (201)
39 60/60 (216)
NA 60/60 (156)
EF 60/60 (183)
EW 00/50 (00)
WaS
S1 64/64 (248)
TF 60/60 (169)
FS 40/40 (93)
PostSun Jan 13, 2008 3:19 am
View user's profile Send private message
EssexSims

 
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 96




Post subject: Akitsuki=Akizuki. Reply with quote
I think it's just different anglicized versions of the same Japanese word.  They should fill a valuable niche in the game since they were specialized AA/ASW task force escorts.  They should help the Japanese in air defense when matched up with a capital ship.  They're not Atlanta's but they'll help.

Her name translates as "Autumn Moon"
PostSun Jan 13, 2008 10:58 am
View user's profile Send private message
Highball

 
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 23 Dec 2007

Posts: 187




Post subject: Re: Akizuki Not Listed on Page Reply with quote
AG124 wrote:
Probably just an omission when the page was first compiled - you should send the webmasters an e-mail and ask why the class hasn't been listed there. Confused Or you could just let it go, I guess.


I sent them an email of course telling them to check into it, but it is amazing it was overlooked because they were such good DD's.
PostSun Jan 13, 2008 3:28 pm
View user's profile Send private message
Algren

 

Joined: 14 Jan 2008

Posts: 15




Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
I am a little confused about the report of the new sculpt Japanese Destroyer. I cannot find any listing of a Akizuki-class destroyer. I found  .....

Asakaze (Asakaze class)
Amatsukaze (Isokaze class)
Akikaze (Minekaze class)
Ajisai (Wakatake class)
Ayanami, Asagiri, Amagiri & Akebono (Fubuki class)
Akatsuki (Akatsuki class)
Ariake (Hatsuharu class)
Asashio, Arashio, Asagumo & Arare (Asashio class)
Akigumo, Asashimo & Akishimo (Yugumo class)
Akitsuki (Akisuki class)

..... but I have not found a Akizuki.

HELP!


Akisuki is a mispelled version of Akizuki.  Both mean the same thing, but in nihongo when you combine certain words k's become g's, t's become d's, h's become b's or p's, and s becomes z.  Hence the two words Aki and suki (correctly spelled tsuki) become Akizuki when combined.  Incidently the name means autumn (aki) moon (tsuki).
PostMon Jan 14, 2008 8:05 pm
View user's profile Send private message
Algren

 

Joined: 14 Jan 2008

Posts: 15




Post subject: Reply with quote
Personally I hope Nagato is in the set.  Fuso or another battleship would be nice, but Nagato is the best the IJN has to offer (aside from Yamato which we already have.)  Also Germany really needs a fighter and Italy doesn't even have a plane.
PostTue Jan 15, 2008 6:09 pm
View user's profile Send private message
ericjohn

 
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader

Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 944




Post subject: Reply with quote
Algren wrote:
Personally I hope Nagato is in the set.  Fuso or another battleship would be nice, but Nagato is the best the IJN has to offer (aside from Yamato which we already have.)  Also Germany really needs a fighter and Italy doesn't even have a plane.


Well we know for sure Italy is getting Sm.79 torpedo bomber for Italy.

I think it's a virtual lock that we will get a competent German fighter in Set II.

I then suspect we will get a cheaper/less useful fighter ala Hurricane for Italy in Set III.
PostTue Jan 15, 2008 7:09 pm
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> WAS General Discussion All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 34, 35, 36  Next
Page 2 of 36

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Donations are used for Forumini Olympics awards (donations admin: Aquarius)
Announcements
Admirals cup nominations (4 places left)
Challenge #10: Logo+banner competition
Forumini Fundraising Item from Riverside Press
Editor's Choice
Dreadnought Rising
All War At Sea Cards
All AAM cards
Forumini Admirals
Forumini Dogfights
Forumini Generals
Forumini Armies
Forumini Gallery
Friends
Official WoTC site
Richard Baker's Blog
Le Forum de A&ANM
Riverside Gaming
Locations of visitors to this page
Top posters
packertim 13359
Okie 6568
The_lucky_Y 6502
RAEVSKI 6500
Duck Crusader 5521
swarbs 5195
DaJudge 4627


Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Theme by: :: Cosmic Distortion ::
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group