| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
 |
|
I Guess you have No planes this turn.
I will do My shooting then
Crip Galstor on Objective Torp on WI
Rolls: (1d6) 
Crip Galstor with Scheer Grp torp on WI
Rolls: (1d6) 
Galstor not Crip Scheer Grp @ WI
Rolls: (2d6)  
Graf Spee torp on WI
Rolls: (1d6)
Give me atleast 1 please |
|
 Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:37 am |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
The entire southern group has been sunk.
Wisconsin primaries on Scharnhorst:
Rolls: (15d6) 
_________________
  |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:40 am |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Admiral Scheer At WAshington Range 2
Rolls: (11d6) 
2ndary @ WASH.
Rolls: (5d6) |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:40 am |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Scharnhorst damaged.
_________________
|
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:40 am |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Well Since I have 2 Now
Bizzy @ WI
Rolls: (12d6)
2ndary @ WI
Rolls: (5d6)
Scharnhorst @ WI
Rolls: (11d6)
2ndary
Rolls: (5d6) |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:44 am |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Nothing there Shitty
Well Iowa has a Damage and Washington gained Another |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:44 am |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Well Know one has extended range Now.
We each Claim 1 Objective
Init.
Rolls: (2d6) +1 |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:46 am |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Well, damaging Wisconsin wouldn't have changed anything - you needed to vital it -either this turn or next- to win. Else it's mate in one, I'm afraid (unless I've overlooked something).
Inits for next turn (no matter, my move will be the same regardless):
Rolls: (2d6) +2
Re-roll:
Rolls: (2d6) +2
Map coming up.
_________________
|
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:47 am |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
My move:
_________________
|
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 5:50 am |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Lets see you killed
2 Spee @ 42 pts
5 Galstors @ 40 pts
2 objectives 120 pts Yup you win
I am Blaming this on the VP rule Change. Otherwise this is far from over. |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:06 am |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I Guess My Only Choice is to try to Vital Iowa.
Bizzy Grp Move 2 Spaces Straight Down Galstor Stays Behind
Crip Galstor Moves Down 1 Space, The other Criped Galstor Stays Put
Kolnx2 Both Move 2 Dwn
The reaining 2 Healthy Galstors to F7 |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:13 am |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I only sank 4 destroyers (though the Dauntlesses should kill two more this turn), but yeah.
Do roll your big guns, you can still vital Wisconsin (though it can vital Bismarck, too...)
Anyhow, I don't think you can "blame" it on the VP change - your initial deployment was quite poor, as you left the southern 2 objectives totally unprotected. You might notice I've done the same in most of my matches: ignore the enemy BBs, let them shoot at mine, and kill escorts / objectives to *just* reach the VP limit.
_________________
|
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:13 am |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Here we go For the Game Basically
Bizzy @ WI
Rolls: (12d6)
2nds
Rolls: (5d6)
Scharn.
Rolls: (11d6)
2nds
Rolls: (5d6) |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:15 am |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Nothing...
Wisconsin shoots back at Bismarck in retaliation:
Rolls: (15d6)
Dauntlesses Able and Baker are grounded due to poor performance.
Thanks for the game! Well done - even though I think your deployment wasn't great, your moves were all excellent, and surprised me more than once. After two turns I really thought I had no way to salvage the game anymore. Definitely the most exciting game of the cup!
_________________
|
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:19 am |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
You win.
I don't think my deployment was poor. You had Mr Range 5 [b]Again[b]. I was trying to use the islands for cover.
You Had to run away to save your BB's
If it wasn't for the VP reduction I would have never moved into you.
Thats the only reason. If the VP Conditions were the same as the rest Of the Whole Tournament, this Game is FAR from Over.
Otherwise good game.[/code] |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:20 am |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Final map:
_________________
|
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 6:22 am |
|
|
USS OKLAHOMA BB-37
Posts: 6666
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Who did the map and ship's? their awsome!!!  
_________________
 |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 7:08 am |
|
|
Posts: 9280
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Congrats both of you. Fascinating game and excellent performance by `Gross Admiral Raeder' despite everything being against him. Settings, German navy limitations, uber enemy admiral.
EvilKobra you're deservedly the Forumini Olympic Champion for War At Sea.
You logged in at the exact moment the competition started in order to get the Admiral that you thought would win, and you did in fact win with excellent use of the Admiral in all 4 games.
_________________
 
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 12:17 pm |
|
|
Posts: 6599
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Hmm it seems to be a mistake not to take two Bismarck class BB in the setup.
_________________
YVAN EHT NIOJ ! |
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 12:39 pm |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Thank you ND. I have to say I've had a very tough time, even with the strongest Admiral out there. And this despite the Dice Gods smiling upon me in all matches (except in the final, which I've really had to sweat). That speaks heaps of the quality of the other players out there - very impressive 
Thank you all 
And once again, thank you ND for making all of this possible.
_________________
|
|
| Sun Mar 16, 2008 12:47 pm |
|
|
|
