| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Posts: 9280
|
|
|
Post subject: WAS Grand Final - Gross Admiral Raeder Vs. EvilKobra (WON)
|
 |
|
 
It's time for the Grand Final.
The new limit is 220 pts. Each of the four objectives is worth 60 pts and you win at 180 pts.
We play historical limits and each ground-base can hold 7 aircraft.
The map for the Grand Final:
Send me your fleets gentlemen  .
edit: oops. Once again I forgot that EK doesn't need to 
_________________
 
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today).
Last edited by NeuralDream on Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:12 am; edited 5 times in total |
|
 Sun Mar 09, 2008 2:32 pm |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Nice map! The fleet limit / VP mismatch is interesting, I would've thought you'd want a deathmatch instead of an objective rush. Especially since historical limits are going to make it tough for the Germans to field more than a few big ships... we'll see.
Herr Raeder, wurden Sie mir Ihre Flotte zeigen, bitte? 
_________________
  |
|
| Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:10 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Sorry, I have not Posted any thing lately, Just finished Moving |
|
| Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:41 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| I will post my fleet Tonite |
|
| Tue Mar 11, 2008 8:11 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| I do not expect to win this game. Although I WILL TRY |
|
| Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:49 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
aX THAT bUILD
mAKE MY bUILD tHIS Please
1x Bizzy
1x Schanrhorst
2x Spee
2x Koln
8x Galstor
219 total pts
This is my Fleet, Forget about my first Posted Fleet
Thanks |
|
| Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:52 pm |
|
|
Posts: 9280
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
You can't have over 6 Karl Galsters. I deleted your previous choice, but you'll have to change this one too.
_________________
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Wed Mar 12, 2008 6:07 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Why Not? |
|
| Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:58 pm |
|
|
Has nothing to say.
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 3847
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Historical Limits.
_________________
I have to make a new sig because my old one is too wide for this new look... |
|
| Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:15 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
What? 
We played Historical limits last game, and I had more then 6 DD
I can't seem to find my Rule book right now (still packed)
I don't recall Karl Gastor being restricted.
So Basically My entire Navy is restricted aside from My Planes and U boats
GREAT  |
|
| Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:20 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
It says Specifically in the rule Book. Classes that have 4 or less are restricted. You can have as many of any other Vessel Not on the list.
Karl Gastor is not on that list.
I just checked the rule book advanced rules |
|
| Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:32 pm |
|
|
War at Sea Major League
Posts: 1739
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
i will put something else together then.
this ruling hurts me even more |
|
| Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:38 pm |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
I don't think we should be too strict on this, he's already handicapped enough. Besides, the Typ 1936 destroyers weren't much different from the 1934s.
As far as I'm concerned he can play with this build, and I'm not too fussed with the whole historical accuracy business anyhow (the Kriegsmarine was never meant to engage the US Navy on equal ground).
_________________
|
|
| Wed Mar 12, 2008 11:14 pm |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
If ND agrees to waive the (IMO unfair) destroyer historical limit, this will be my fleet:
SBD Dauntless flights Able, Baker and Charlie
USS North Carolina
USS Washington
and, of course,
USS Wisconsin
for a total of 219 points.
My deployment roll:
Rolls: (2d6) 
Initiative roll for turn 1:
Rolls: (2d6)   +2
_________________
|
|
| Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:04 am |
|
|
Posts: 9280
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Since your opponent agrees I waive the limit of Galsters. We'll call the two additional destroyers Typ1934 
_________________
My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today). |
|
| Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:30 am |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Thanks ND
Let the show begin...
_________________
|
|
| Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:31 am |
|
|
Has nothing to say.
AHF Silver-Rated Trader
Posts: 3847
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Methinks that once again Spruance will triumph.
_________________
I have to make a new sig because my old one is too wide for this new look... |
|
| Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:34 am |
|
|
Posts: 890
|
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Go Raeder. |
|
| Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:39 am |
|
|
AHF Bronze-Rated Trader
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
Go Evilkobra, lead the american fleet to victory! 
_________________
“Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, and brains saves both.”
-Erwin Rommel
 |
|
| Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:55 am |
|
|
Resident U-Head
|
|
Post subject:
|
|
|
| Masterchief wrote: | | Go Evilkobra, lead the american fleet to victory! |
Yay, someone is cheering for me!
I thought by now everyone would be looking forward to Spruance being crushed like a bug. I know I would, if I wasn't playing him.
Is this a bad time to say I usually always play as the Kriegsmarine and before admirals were even assigned I was secretly hoping Dönitz would win the tourney?
_________________
|
|
| Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:01 am |
|
|
|
