Archive for Axis & Allies ForuMINI Specialised in the World War II Axis & Allies Miniatures and War At Sea Games
 


       Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> Infantry Discussion
Sharpe

Evzone [APPROVED & LOCKED]

(0-1) 8/ (2-3) 6/ (4) 5
(0-1) 1

Speed 1
Defense 4/7
Cover 4

CA3
ALPINE--Enemy units get -1 Attack Die against this unit when it is in a hill or mountain hex.  This unit ignores Movement Rolls except when crossing a river.

Cost 4

Date 7/36
RAEVSKI

ohh i like the the -1 can it apply to the Romanian mountain troops too.
Sharpe

It's my standard mountain troop ability.  I'll get to the Vanatori soon.
NeuralDream

Would it be better phrased as " roll 1 less attack die " instead of " get -1 attack die"? Maybe the latter can be confused with " get -1 on each die" which is also common in other SAs. Not sure. Just wondering.
NeuralDream

Also, why specifically the 2/39 regiment? Would other evzones have different stats?

And a nice image for the card maker. Doing their famous charge against the Julia division and yelling their battlecry "Aera".

RAEVSKI

where is there pretty skirts Smile
Sharpe

I used the 2/39 for the Sharpedia unit.  The reason is lost in the mists of history.  As I learn more about other Evzones, I would make different cards.
NeuralDream

I see. Then, we'll need specialised photo for each of the regiments. Hm, that will be a bit tough.


Btw, for Raevski:

The nice 1920s skirts gave way to the more boring 1940s look Razz

1920s


1940s
NeuralDream

For more photos: http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=106055
RAEVSKI

Ohh well at least they have funky shoes
Sharpe

We're going to have to use units as names if we keep updating units over the course of the war.
Angel of Death

Amandil

Sharpe wrote:
We're going to have to use units as names if we keep updating units over the course of the war.

Well, not if we have other better alternatives like "Carcano Riflemen" or "Stormfusiliers" or whatever.  These names are a little more generalized than units as names.
Sharpe

Amandil wrote:
Sharpe wrote:
We're going to have to use units as names if we keep updating units over the course of the war.

Well, not if we have other better alternatives like "Carcano Riflemen" or "Stormfusiliers" or whatever.  These names are a little more generalized than units as names.


See thread on naming decision.
Sharpe

AoD--> Great job.

1.  I don't think the Greeks used the "th" after numbers.  We would read this as 2nd Batt of 39 th Reg, but it's actually the 2nd evzone rgt and 39th ingf regt.  ND will set us straight.

2.  Please change 2nd SA to "Enemy units roll 1 fewer Attack Die . . . "

Thanks
Buzzkill

Fixed name, pic and SA text.




and here is a suggestion for a name:



This gives us the flavor of the specific unit (Evzone) with out naming a specific regiment. Using Regiment in the title is a little confusing considering that it is a fire team of 4-5 guys. Also, I am not completely up to speed on my Evzone history, but what if, for example, the 2/39 never fought in a certain battle or against a certain opponent, that may not be a big deal but some people may see that as a historical snafu. I'm not trying to reopen the naming debate, just make a suggestion for a small modification. Anyways, just my opinion, you know what they say about those!
Sharpe

Sharpe wrote:

1.  I don't think the Greeks used the "th" after numbers.  


Even though I was stupid enough to put it in the title.   Embarassed
Sharpe

Card looks good and good suggestion about the name.
NeuralDream

Actually, in WoTC nomenclature it's "... one less attack die ...".

Why is the image b&w?!
Sharpe

"fewer" is correct English Grammar

Fewer is used for discrete things "I want fewer lumps of sugar."

Less is used when you can't actually count the object "I want less sugar."

I would prefer not to leave behind a legacy of illiteracy.
NeuralDream

No problem with fewer, but using "less" for the special case of one is widely recognised as an unofficial exception. For example, nobody says "One fewer thing to worry about". In any case, my comment referred to consistency with AAM cards and not to grammar. I'm ok with both Smile.
Sharpe

NeuralDream wrote:
No problem with fewer, but using "less" for the special case of one is widely recognised as an unofficial exception. For example, nobody says "One fewer thing to worry about". In any case, my comment referred to consistency with AAM cards and not to grammar. I'm ok with both Smile.


Nobody except me.

Again it's no biggie.  I just don't want to be sloppy because WoTC is.
Buzzkill

NeuralDream wrote:
Why is the image b&w?!


I noticed that AoD was changing the color pics to b&w for the cards, I assumed I missed a card designers meeting about that so I followed suit. Its an easy fix, you tell me what you want boss.
NeuralDream

Leave the images as they are. The specific one is a painting and it would be "cheating" to make it look like a real photo IMO. Also, if you could press Enter between first and second S.A. that would be great Smile. Another think that you need to do before publishing the locked cards (later) is to delete the columns and rows that are unnecessary. In this case it's the AA row.
Angel of Death

       Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> Infantry Discussion
Page 1 of 1