Bull Halsey
|
200 PT Fleetok i decided that this a no BB CV Subs or Aircraft fleet to mak it fair
2 USS Alaska=56
8 Baltimore=144
their this the revised CA fleet so thisis 199 points this is cruisers only fleet so any thoughts questions or fleets to beat this
|
jfkziegler
|
Powerful fleet for cruisers, but they would have a lot of trouble even hitting battleships. Your best shot would be to swarm to the objectives.
|
Bull Halsey
|
well this would be only against cruiser only fleets any way that would make it fair i guess right
|
jfkziegler
|
Well, if it was only going to go against cruiser fleets, you wouldn't need the Atlanta's, because aircraft wouldn't be a threat.
|
Bull Halsey
|
yea but it gives more target but ill edit it thanks JFK your a good admin
|
jfkziegler
|
Well, thanks. 
|
Inspiring Lieutenant
|
Re: 200 PT Fleet | Bull Halsey wrote: | | no BB CV Subs or Aircraft fleet to mak it fair |
So, to make it fair, you're allowing cruisers and destroyers only? In that case, how about this:
USS Alaska x 7 (196)
Sounds fair to me. 
|
The_lucky_Y
|
16 Isokaze
1 Yahagi
1 Akitzuki
would give your USN cruisers a serious headache...
|
Inspiring Lieutenant
|
| The_lucky_Y wrote: | 16 Isokaze
1 Yahagi
1 Akitzuki
would give your USN cruisers a serious headache... |
Yes, you are right. I think that the Japanese Long-Lance would dominate this odd format, especially with the new Aoba and Oi.
|
The_lucky_Y
|
would stuck on Isokazes only because the cannot be shoot at on ER4 and they are cheaper then all IJN cruisers who have no ER4 even those with the new set 3 stats.
(the Yajagi is only in the build because the init boost can help a lot.
|
King Tiger
|
I dunno why people think it would have trouble against BB's, I've taken BB's out with baltimores stacks of times
but against I would use
4xNachi 76pts
Aoba 20pts
8xAkitsuki 80ptspts
2xShigure 24pts
|
Bull Halsey
|
cool sound good forgot about alaska
|
