Archive for Axis & Allies ForuMINI Specialised in the World War II Axis & Allies Miniatures and War At Sea Games
|
Ducky
|
100 point RomaniaT-4 Medium Tank (x2)
R-35 (x3)
Romanian Infantry (x5)
Antitank Grenadier (x3)
Vigilant Lieutenant (x1)
Bohler 47mm Antitank Gun (x1)
----
115
What do you guys think?
|
King Tiger
|
well you've overpriced yourself a little, this is 114pts not 115, but thats still not 100pts, but I assume your using the advanced rules single nationality armies rules?
you can get a little more in there though
2xT-4's
3xR-35's
Romanian Antitank platoon (Vigilant LT, 2xGrenadier, 2xBohler)
5xRiflemen
1xGrenadier
still 114pts, but now you have 1 extra AT gun
|
RedBaron
|
I do not know with the platoon cards, I heard they are obsolete because of the revisions.
Anyway, there are not that many romanian units but I would go for 115 pt with:
3x T4 = 69
1x Vigiant Lt = 8
5x AT Gren = 20
3x RO Inf = 9
1x R2 lt 35 = 9
T4 and AT grens for enemy armor, romanian inf and lt 35 for enemy infantry. Vig Lt for initiative. Maybe this build is heavy on AT units but I think the gren's can do something against enemy soldiers also.
I do not see any reason to play the Bohler and R35, but for historical or scenario reasons they can be an option.
|
King Tiger
|
| RedBaron wrote: | | I do not know with the platoon cards, I heard they are obsolete because of the revisions. |
well after looking at the A&A home site I see nothing saying there useless
|
RedBaron
|
If I am not mistaking (I could be though), the point system for platoons was calculated before the revision when a RO AT Gren had a value of 5 points not 4, for example. That changes everything...
|
NeuralDream
|
That's right.
|
Cpt. John Miller
|
Re: 100 point Romania | Ducky wrote: | T-4 Medium Tank (x2)
R-35 (x3)
Romanian Infantry (x5)
Antitank Grenadier (x3)
Vigilant Lieutenant (x1)
Bohler 47mm Antitank Gun (x1)
----
115
What do you guys think? |
I would go with more Bohlers and less Renaults because they are such a great value and can get a bonus from the commander. Just my 2 cents, I love those camouflaged ATGs.
|
King Tiger
|
| RedBaron wrote: | | If I am not mistaking (I could be though), the point system for platoons was calculated before the revision when a RO AT Gren had a value of 5 points not 4, for example. That changes everything... |
no it doesn't, a platoon of them is still 22pts, in the old costs you saved 10pts, in the new costs your now only saving 8pts, so now technically is less of a good deal by 2pts, its not giving you any advantages still
|
Cpt. John Miller
|
| King Tiger wrote: | | RedBaron wrote: | | If I am not mistaking (I could be though), the point system for platoons was calculated before the revision when a RO AT Gren had a value of 5 points not 4, for example. That changes everything... |
no it doesn't, a platoon of them is still 22pts, in the old costs you saved 10pts, in the new costs your now only saving 8pts, so now technically is less of a good deal by 2pts, its not giving you any advantages still |
Sticking to your guns huh?
Platoons are laserdiscs or betamax. Functionally Obsolete.
|
Ducky
|
| Cpt. John Miller wrote: | | King Tiger wrote: | | RedBaron wrote: | | If I am not mistaking (I could be though), the point system for platoons was calculated before the revision when a RO AT Gren had a value of 5 points not 4, for example. That changes everything... |
no it doesn't, a platoon of them is still 22pts, in the old costs you saved 10pts, in the new costs your now only saving 8pts, so now technically is less of a good deal by 2pts, its not giving you any advantages still |
Sticking to your guns huh?
Platoons are laserdiscs or betamax. Functionally Obsolete. |
It's true, but along with losing some benefits of the platoons, Nationalist China can have Brit/American allies, and 1940+ Poland can rejoin the fight 
|
|