Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index Axis & Allies ForuMINI
Specialised in the World War II Axis & Allies Miniatures and War At Sea Games
 
AAM AAM disr. AAM crack. WAS WAS crip. WAS Torp
The prob. of at least successes with dice is %
The AAM/WAS calculator works only if you have JAVASCRIPT enabled. Known bug: doesn't work for more successes than dice
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index
Most Recent Popular
USS IOWA
Rate my first pulls, 1 starter, 2 boosters from original set

WAS FAQ - Clarification Starts Here
Page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> WAS Rules Clarification
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 4446


PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 2:30 am    Post subject: WAS FAQ - Clarification Starts Here Reply with quote

The War at Sea Rules Clarification forum is here to help you.  Before you post a question, please consult the resources below to see if it is already answered there.  Of course, should further elabortation or explanation be required to settle your case, start a new thread and everyone here will be happy to help.

First, some resources.
You probably already have the rulebook, but in case you don't, it can be downloaded here by clicking on Download Advanced Rules:
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=ah/aam/WaratSea

A supplement to the rulebook has been released by Avalon Hill making sweeping changes in the game, including moving surface torpedoes into the surface attack phase, giving a penalty to strafing fighters, and adding rules for harassing submarines.  It also clarifies some oft mis-understood rules.  It is available here:
http://www.wizards.com/avalonhill/rules/War_at_Sea_Clarifications.pdf

The old (now defunct) Avalon Hill forum featured a section where WAS questions could be answered by an actual employee with the power to make rulings.  Much of this information (though you can no longer post there) is still relevant and can be found here:
http://boards.avalonhill.com/showthread.php?t=19718

Additionally, the new Gleemax boards offers a place to post questions which can be answered 'officially' by a WotC representative, these can be found here:
http://forums.gleemax.com/forumdisplay.php?f=758

Numerous questions arose about the second set of WAS, Task Force.  Enough confusion abounded that an FAQ was needed for that set alone, here it is:
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=ah/aam/ah20080724c



In response to a request for a sort of WAS FAQ, I have created this thread to post a few common questions and thier answers.  If you have a suggestion for a commonly mis-understood rule, please post it here and I will add it to the FAQ, thanks.  And with that, here we go.  If you notice mistakes (especially concerning the rules) please notify me in a reply or by PM as well.

WAS FAQ

Gunnery and Bomb attacks:
These attacks must be rolled one at a time.  Attacks from multiple units at the same target, or attacks by multiple gunnery values from the same ship (main, secondary, etc) are all rolled by themselves and are never added together.

Example:  Rodney is attacking an enemy vessel at range 3.  It may target that vessel with both its main and its secondary guns, but each attack is rolled seperately.  Instead of one attack of 18 dice, Rodney gets one attack with 13 dice and one attack with 5 dice.

Note:  The rules also state that torpedo attacks should be made seperately, and it is good practice to do so.  This is despite the fact that rolling torpedos together gives no advantage to the attacker, unlike stacking gunnery attacks.

Capturing Objectives:
Objectives are captured at the end of each turn by a player who has a ship in an objective sector where no enemy ships are local or adjacent.  Submarines are unit type submarine, not ship.  Therefore, submarines do not keep a player from capturing an objective even if they are local or adjacent.  Ships with the No Sea Control SA cannot capture objectives.  However, because they are unit type ship, they do deny the capture of an objective which they are local or adjacent to.


Smoke Screens/Concealment:
Smoke screens come into effect immediately, despite the fact that action during a single phase is regarded as being simultaneous.  All units within a smoke screen have concealment, including aircraft, which gain a concealment roll against any attack made against them.  Concealment rolls, if successful, nullify one entire attack, whether it be gunnery, bombs, or a salvo of torpedos.  Note that if multiple torpedo hits are scored in a single salvo, the concealment roll is for all of these hits.

Aborted Fighters
Fighters are aborted just as any other aircraft during the Air Defense phase.  However, all attacks are considered to be resolved at the same time.  Therefore, the SA's of the aborted fighter (such as Escort) remain in effect for the rest of the Air Defense phase.  Additionally, the fighter may still attack enemy air targets during this Air Defense phase, so it is entirely possible for two fighters to abort each other during a single Air Defense phase.
_________________


Last edited by swarbs on Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:11 am; edited 6 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 4446


PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 2:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok, this is just to make a start of it, here's the top three questions I've seen pop up.  Any further suggestions, please reply, any mistakes, please reply.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Duck Crusader


Tora Tora Tora


Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 3763

Location: Kansas USA

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 2:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do the air attacks one, does an aborted fighter get to attack in AA phase/does an aborted fighter still cover the bombers. Yes to both IIRC

edit by Swarbs - added this one to the list, thanks for the suggestion
_________________

Member of the Helldivers WAS league
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Okie


USS OKLAHOMA BB-37


Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 5718

Location: OKC. Oklahoma

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you Swarbs as this will be a big help when question's arise.
table talk
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EvilKobra
'Bad Cop' Admin
Resident U-Head


Joined: 08 Jan 2008




Posts: 1689

Location: At periscope depth

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great work!

One question, though: are you sure about ships with No Sea Control? I was under the impression that such ships also could not contest objectives.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 4446


PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

EvilKobra wrote:
Great work!

One question, though: are you sure about ships with No Sea Control? I was under the impression that such ships also could not contest objectives.


Yep, here is the quote from the clarifications document:
No Sea Control: Units with this special ability cannot claim objectives, but they do
prevent an opponent from claiming an objective by being in or adjacent to that objective.

I actually included this one as much for me as for anyone else, before the clarifications doc came out I adamantly attacked someone on the old boards for saying PT boats could contend objectives.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cealigh the MadScot


I AM the Mad Scot! None are my equal! Many are my betters!


Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 1231

Location: Arizona not near any water other than my sink,tub,shower,pool, toilet.

PostPosted: Wed Mar 26, 2008 2:00 pm    Post subject: THANK YOU! Reply with quote

Thank you, this will definitely help out.
_________________
Rapier $350, Armor $200,1500's Garb $150,Mask $100,Beating the crap out of your friends for fun!-PRICELESS!fencing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
rutilius




Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 18

Location: columbus ohio

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

does the escort ability cover more than one flight?
i.e. if i park a wildcat in a square and 3 dive bombers do all the bombers benefit from the escort?
thank you
mike
_________________
The scariest sound is not the roar of a lion about to charge, or a trumpet of an elephant bearing down on you. It is a click when you wanted a BANG!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
afilter



Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 1595

Location: WI

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

rutilius wrote:
does the escort ability cover more than one flight?
i.e. if i park a wildcat in a square and 3 dive bombers do all the bombers benefit from the escort?
thank you
mike


Yes one fighter escorts all bombers in the same sector.
_________________
Aaron

Sets Complete:
BS- 48/48        Set II-45/45     C.S.- 45/45       D-Day -45/45   RES- 45/45       39-45 - 60/60  
WAS- 64/64      N.A. - 60/60      T.F. - 60/60       E.F. - 60/60 Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 4446


PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

afilter wrote:
rutilius wrote:
does the escort ability cover more than one flight?
i.e. if i park a wildcat in a square and 3 dive bombers do all the bombers benefit from the escort?
thank you
mike


Yes one fighter escorts all bombers in the same sector.


Yep, thanks for catching this one afilter, I haven't paid enough attention.  All bombers in the same square recieve escort.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
afilter



Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 1595

Location: WI

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Capturing Objectives:
Objectives are captured at the end of each phase by a player who has a ship in an objective sector where no enemy ships are local or adjacent.  Submarines are unit type submarine, not ship.  Therefore, submarines do not keep a player from capturing an objective even if they are local or adjacent.  Ships with the No Sea Control SA cannot capture objectives.  However, because they are unit type ship, they do deny the capture of an objective which they are local or adjacent to.


Should the word phase be replaced with Turn?
_________________
Aaron

Sets Complete:
BS- 48/48        Set II-45/45     C.S.- 45/45       D-Day -45/45   RES- 45/45       39-45 - 60/60  
WAS- 64/64      N.A. - 60/60      T.F. - 60/60       E.F. - 60/60 Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 4446


PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

afilter wrote:
Capturing Objectives:
Objectives are captured at the end of each phase by a player who has a ship in an objective sector where no enemy ships are local or adjacent.  Submarines are unit type submarine, not ship.  Therefore, submarines do not keep a player from capturing an objective even if they are local or adjacent.  Ships with the No Sea Control SA cannot capture objectives.  However, because they are unit type ship, they do deny the capture of an objective which they are local or adjacent to.


Should the word phase be replaced with Turn?


Another big save.  Thanks very much.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 4446


PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adding link to the old forum's question thread.  Questions here were often answered by a WotC official rules arbiter (though since the forum has closed I haven't seen much of Y2UAsk on Gleemax).  
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EvilKobra
'Bad Cop' Admin
Resident U-Head


Joined: 08 Jan 2008




Posts: 1689

Location: At periscope depth

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 7:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's an interesting clarification over at Gleemax about how Zuikaku's SA works. Among other things, it defines the land airbase as a sector not adjacent to any other sea sectors. Here it is:

WotC wrote:

Defensive Armament applies against all fighter attacks, so it does apply against Airfield Strikes, BUT ...

Defensive Armament increases only the aircraft's armor, not its vital armor. Aborting a target aircraft during an Airfield Strike has no effect -- the aircraft is already sitting out the turn at the land airbase. The only result that matters in an Airfield Strike is destruction of the target by beating its Vital Armor, which isn't bumped by Defensive Armament.

For the Japanese, the optimal attack is Zekes, on turn 1, stiffened by Expert Dogfighter, hitting something with relatively low vital armor.

I'll go ahead and answer the obvious follow-up questions now. All of these have to do with the application of the word "sector" in regard to the Airfield Strike SA. Generally, the land airbase is treated the same as a sea sector when it comes under air attack.

1) Interceptor does kick in if the enemy has no fighters at the airbase and your fighter attacks a bomber.

2) Likewise, Escort kicks in if an enemy fighter attacks your bomber on your land airbase while you have an Escort fighter there, even if it's rearming.

3) Combat Air Patrol can't be used to shift a fighter into your opponent's land airbase, because the base isn't directly connected to any sea sectors (it's separated by that thick, black border).

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
jfkziegler
.
.



Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 4384

Location: Richmond, Virginia

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It sucks that a re-arming fighter can still provide escort.  That doesn't make much sense.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 4446


PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With rulings like this about specific unit SA's, should we add some units to the FAQ section or are links to the WotC clarifications and forum good enough?  It seems good to have some up in our own document, but I'm not convinced people read this before posting questions anyway, and if it is just a huge amount of material it would be even more imposing to wade through all of it.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeuralDream



Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 8240

Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

swarbs wrote:
With rulings like this about specific unit SA's, should we add some units to the FAQ section or are links to the WotC clarifications and forum good enough?  It seems good to have some up in our own document, but I'm not convinced people read this before posting questions anyway, and if it is just a huge amount of material it would be even more imposing to wade through all of it.


swarbs, what I've suggested just now to the other admins is to compile a FAQ document with WoTC's answers and send it to R.B. together with the rest of the feedback. Then I guess he may get someone in WoTC to edit it and make the official Clarifications document just like last year for Set I. Unless we get such an official document I don't expect to see any errata. Not even for the U-66.

It would be fantastic if someone could prepare this document.
_________________

My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
cealigh the MadScot


I AM the Mad Scot! None are my equal! Many are my betters!


Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 1231

Location: Arizona not near any water other than my sink,tub,shower,pool, toilet.

PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Question: can a fighter make an AA attack against a fighter in the same sector that they are escorting a bomber/torpedo etc, and the bomber still benefit from the "Escort" ability from the fighter's SA?

IE: US has a stand of Daunts attacking  a IJN BB in a sector and are escorted by a stand of Hellcats. the IJN player places a stand of zekes in the same sector to attack the bombers.  The SA for the Hell cats indicates Escort and Advanced Tactical fighter.
Can the Daunts benefit from the Hellcats SA of "Escort" if the Hellcats attack the Zekes in the players AA step and still use the Advanced Tactical fighter SA in an effort to destroy the enemy fighters?
I'm thinking yes.  The Escort SA is a passive type of SA that does not benefit the fighter, and since the Fighters mission in this case is to "escort" the bombers to their target and keep the enemy fighters off of them.  They should be able to use their active SA that benefits them directly against the enemy fighters. Then if they make a direct attack against the enemy fighters in the aa step and destroys or aborts them then they are doing their prescribed mission.  Escorting the Bombers etc to the targets.
_________________
Rapier $350, Armor $200,1500's Garb $150,Mask $100,Beating the crap out of your friends for fun!-PRICELESS!fencing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
cealigh the MadScot


I AM the Mad Scot! None are my equal! Many are my betters!


Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 1231

Location: Arizona not near any water other than my sink,tub,shower,pool, toilet.

PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 11:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cealigh the MadScot wrote:
Question: can a fighter make an AA attack against a fighter in the same sector that they are escorting a bomber/torpedo etc, and the bomber still benefit from the "Escort" ability from the fighter's SA?

IE: US has a stand of Daunts attacking  a IJN BB in a sector and are escorted by a stand of Hellcats. the IJN player places a stand of zekes in the same sector to attack the bombers.  The SA for the Hell cats indicates Escort and Advanced Tactical fighter.
Can the Daunts benefit from the Hellcats SA of "Escort" if the Hellcats attack the Zekes in the players AA step and still use the Advanced Tactical fighter SA in an effort to destroy the enemy fighters?
I'm thinking yes.  The Escort SA is a passive type of SA that does not benefit the fighter, and since the Fighters mission in this case is to "escort" the bombers to their target and keep the enemy fighters off of them.  They should be able to use their active SA that benefits them directly against the enemy fighters. Then if they make a direct attack against the enemy fighters in the aa step and destroys or aborts them then they are doing their prescribed mission.  Escorting the Bombers etc to the targets.

and to follow up that question,
That the Fighter stand cannot both attack an enemy fighter and attack an enemy bomber that are in the same sector and have the fighter benefit or it's escorts benefit from the Escort ablility, since the fighter has to choose a single target for it's AA.
_________________
Rapier $350, Armor $200,1500's Garb $150,Mask $100,Beating the crap out of your friends for fun!-PRICELESS!fencing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
swarbs
.
.
Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007


Posts: 4446


PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 11:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Escort only requires that it be in the same sector as the bomber for that bomber to get the bonus.  So yes, it doesn't really matter what the fighter does in the air attack phase, it can attack a fighter a bomber whatever, and still the escort works.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> WAS Rules Clarification All times are GMT
Page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Donations are used for Forumini Olympics awards (donations admin: Aquarius)
Announcements
Forumini Quiz: Question #9
Forumini Olympics Overall rankings
Prizes for Forumini Competitions
Editor's Choice
Forumini Gallery
Friends
Official WoTC site
Richard Baker's Blog
Le Forum de A&ANM
Axis&Allies.org
Riverside Gaming
Locations of visitors to this page
Top posters
packertim 11946
Okie 5718
RAEVSKI 4862
swarbs 4446
jfkziegler 4384
The_lucky_Y 4023
DaJudge 3788
Duck Crusader 3763
Jesse_James 3340
Task Force 57 3020

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group