:: Home :: FAQ :: Search :: Memberlist :: Usergroups :: Join! (free) :: Profile :: Log in to check your private messages :: Log in ::
== HMAS Gayunda (LMS) - under review ==

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> Dreadnought Rising
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NeuralDream

 

Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 9294




Post subject: == HMAS Gayunda (LMS) - under review == Reply with quote
suggested by Tech_Hawk, who also found the schematic of the ship. I edited the image heavily to combine the two views in one. I think the end result looks great.

HMAS Gayunda

Cost: $0.2M  (£35,000)
Available: Mar. 1885



Code:

Gunboat
360 tons
36m
10.5 knots
Armament: 1 x 8" BL
1 x 6" BL  (100 lbs, 1920 f/s)
2 x 1.5" QF (2.8 lbs, 2000 f/s)
2 x MG


The 8 inch gun is the one at the front
The aft one is the 6 inch.

The armament of this ship changed a few times after 1905, but I keep here the original, because DR is not necessarily constrained within WWI years, and also because it's difficult to tell the actual cost of the modifications.


_________________

My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today).
PostSun Oct 05, 2008 11:24 am
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tech_Hawk

 

Joined: 10 Feb 2008

Posts: 293




Post subject: Reply with quote
cool thanks that look great. you should see what it looks like now nothing like that because it has been used as a breakwater for many years.
_________________
PostMon Oct 06, 2008 2:10 am
View user's profile Send private message
lotharlutjens

-------
 


Joined: 24 Jul 2008

Posts: 2190




Post subject: Reply with quote
Beta (LMS) test series Gayunda

HMAS Gayunda            .2 million dollars

Australia          Destroyer/Gunboat           Mar. 1885

Spd = 1

             Bow          Broadside       Stern
M Btty   6/5/4/2            NA               NA
M Btty      NA             3/2/1/1        */2/1/1
AA  = 2
TT  = NA
DA = NA
Armor = 1             Vital Armor = 4         Hull = 1  

SHALLOW DRAFT
_________________
Gaming for 36 Years.


Last edited by lotharlutjens on Fri Jan 09, 2009 3:30 am; edited 1 time in total
PostThu Jan 08, 2009 6:05 pm
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tiornu

Naval Historian
 Moderator


Joined: 14 Jan 2008

Posts: 938




Post subject: Re: == HMAS Gayunda (LMS) - under review == Reply with quote
Isn't that adorable? These were called flatiron gunboats, or Rendel gunboats, after the designer at Armstrong. Fire control was rather elementary for the big guns; you had to aim the entire ship at the target. I believe the intent was to get an ultra-cheap local defense vessel.
PostThu Jan 08, 2009 8:09 pm
View user's profile Send private message
lotharlutjens

-------
 


Joined: 24 Jul 2008

Posts: 2190




Post subject: Reply with quote
Are you telling me the guns were fixed to fire only fore and aft ? (8" forward 6" aft)
Please illuminate me oh great and wise Tiornu. (BTW I'm only half kidding). You are a veritable fountain of knowledge when it comes to warships. Thank you so much for any input as always.
_________________
Gaming for 36 Years.
PostThu Jan 08, 2009 9:22 pm
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tiornu

Naval Historian
 Moderator


Joined: 14 Jan 2008

Posts: 938




Post subject: Reply with quote
The forward gun, as completed, had no traverse. At least, that is my recollection. It was a disappearing mount with extremely slow rate of fire, probably muzzle-loading, and the hull provided a poor gunnery platform except in the stillest of waters. That aft gun was added later, so presumably it was more "normal." I'm not aware of any flatirons having their main guns altered to more modern standards, but I suppose its possible.
The flatirons went through a period when they were all the rage as they apparently offered weaker countries a viable deterrant. Fortunately there was little opportunity to learn how limited they really were.
PostFri Jan 09, 2009 12:07 am
View user's profile Send private message
swarbs

.
 Nothing but Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.


Joined: 23 Dec 2007



Posts: 5398




Post subject: Reply with quote
Tiornu wrote:
The forward gun, as completed, had no traverse. At least, that is my recollection. It was a disappearing mount with extremely slow rate of fire, probably muzzle-loading, and the hull provided a poor gunnery platform except in the stillest of waters. That aft gun was added later, so presumably it was more "normal." I'm not aware of any flatirons having their main guns altered to more modern standards, but I suppose its possible.
The flatirons went through a period when they were all the rage as they apparently offered weaker countries a viable deterrant. Fortunately there was little opportunity to learn how limited they really were.


Fortunately for the flatirons and thier crews at least.  My historical 'field' if I can be said to have one, is the early US navy, where gunboats were repeatedly demonstrated to be ill-suited to fighting anything except other gunboats, and those only by boarding.  Even anchored in calm water they were horrible shots.  It seems to me that a weapons system that by design hands the opponent the choice of where, when and how to fight will never be the best choice.
_________________
PostFri Jan 09, 2009 3:27 am
View user's profile Send private message
lotharlutjens

-------
 


Joined: 24 Jul 2008

Posts: 2190




Post subject: Reply with quote
Thank You Tiornu, that will certainly give this card some character.
_________________
Gaming for 36 Years.
PostFri Jan 09, 2009 3:29 am
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
NeuralDream

 

Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 9294




Post subject: Reply with quote
Have Tiornu's comments been incorporated in the stats or SAs?
_________________

My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today).
PostMon Jan 19, 2009 2:53 am
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
RAEVSKI

.
 SOCCEROO FEVER


Joined: 16 Jan 2008

Posts: 6918




Post subject: Reply with quote
It had a sister ship called Paluma. they were named in aboriginal Thunder and Lightning.
Please consider HMAS Australia (Battlecrusier) and HMAS Sydney as ships to include.
_________________
PostMon Jan 19, 2009 3:10 am
View user's profile Send private message
NeuralDream

 

Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 9294




Post subject: Reply with quote
A very colourful unit. Bump to make sure we have latest stats before I make card.
_________________

My new blog, specialised in the military equipment of Greece (1821-today).
PostWed Apr 01, 2009 5:12 pm
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lotharlutjens

-------
 


Joined: 24 Jul 2008

Posts: 2190




Post subject: Reply with quote
Yes ND, this card has the Bow gun firing straight ahead while the Stern gun has traverse to Broadside. I think she can become a card.
_________________
Gaming for 36 Years.
PostSat Jul 25, 2009 5:12 pm
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jesse_James

.
 Illuminated Insanity


Joined: 22 Dec 2007

Posts: 4592




Post subject: Reply with quote
lotharlutjens wrote:
Yes ND, this card has the Bow gun firing straight ahead while the Stern gun has traverse to Broadside. I think she can become a card.


A little late on that reply eh lothar?

Yeah I am poking over that long absence!


Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing  Laughing
_________________
Always Flying. Always Fighting. RIP JIMMY.

PostSat Jul 25, 2009 9:59 pm
View user's profile Send private message
lotharlutjens

-------
 


Joined: 24 Jul 2008

Posts: 2190




Post subject: Reply with quote
Your right Jesse, but at least I'm finally starting to get the boilers lit again.
_________________
Gaming for 36 Years.
PostSun Jul 26, 2009 4:02 pm
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Axis & Allies ForuMINI Forum Index -> Dreadnought Rising All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Donations are used for Forumini Olympics awards (donations admin: Aquarius)
Announcements
HERE'S YOUR CHANCE TO OWN USS NEW YORK!
Editor's Choice
All AAM cards
Forumini Admirals
All War At Sea Cards
Dreadnought Rising
Forumini Dogfights
Forumini Generals
Forumini Armies
Forumini Gallery
Friends
Official WoTC site
Richard Baker's Blog
Le Forum de A&ANM
Riverside Gaming
Locations of visitors to this page
Top posters
packertim 13359
RAEVSKI 6918
Okie 6674
The_lucky_Y 6668
Duck Crusader 5735
swarbs 5398
DaJudge 4788


Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Theme by: :: Cosmic Distortion ::
Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group